Blog Old

Diversifying Capital Raising Strategies for Startups

Navigating the VC Winter: Diversifying Capital Raising Strategies for Startups

In the face of a VC winter, startups find themselves at a crucial juncture, requiring innovative approaches to secure funding. We will embark on an exploration of the myriad avenues available for raising capital beyond the traditional venture capital (VC) sphere. We dive into anecdotes of how private companies have creatively accessed funds, emphasizing the importance of not being tethered to a single source of capital. The focus is on the JOBS Act and its provisions, which offer startups a variety of options with potentially more favorable terms than VC funding. We’ll tackle the challenges companies face in this endeavor, from navigating regulatory landscapes to attracting investors. Additionally, we outline seven strategic steps to diversify funding sources, reinforcing the necessity of a well-rounded understanding of all available options. By the end, startups and established companies alike will be equipped with the knowledge to navigate the capital raising process effectively, leveraging regulations to their advantage and working with trusted advisors to ensure success.

The Landscape of Raising Capital

Raising capital for private companies is an art form, with various avenues from VC and angel investments to friends and family, bank loans, government grants, and the provisions under the JOBS Act. Each source has its narrative, shaping the journey of a startup in unique ways. These stories reveal a broader landscape of funding opportunities, illustrating that the path to securing capital is not linear but a web of interconnected routes.

Beyond VC: The JOBS Act and Other Avenues

Entrepreneurs must look beyond VC to fuel their growth, especially in times when VC funding becomes scarce. The JOBS Act emerges as a beacon of hope in such times, offering three distinct regulations (RegCF, RegD 506c, RegA+) that provide startups with options for funding. These options often come with better terms than traditional VC deals, underscoring the importance of a strategic approach that blends various funding sources. This strategy not only mitigates the risk associated with relying on a single source but also broadens the potential investor base.

Navigating Capital-Raising Challenges

The journey of raising capital is fraught with challenges, from understanding the regulatory framework to choosing the right partners for issuance and attracting potential investors. A significant hurdle is the lack of awareness about the diversity of funding sources. Many companies do not realize the breadth of options available to them, limiting their potential to secure the necessary capital. Familiarity with each source’s regulatory roadmap, working with trusted FINRA Broker-Dealers, and leveraging technology partners for issuance are crucial steps in this process.

Understanding Sources of Capital

A comprehensive understanding of all sources of capital is essential. Each source, from VC and bank funding to government grants, friends and family, and the JOBS Act, comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For instance, while VC funding can offer significant capital and mentorship, it often requires giving up a portion of equity and control. On the other hand, JOBS Act funding may provide more favorable terms but requires navigating a regulatory landscape and a totally different approach in attracting investors to your company.

Seven Steps to Raising Capital

  1. Educate Yourself on Regulations: Understanding the legal framework is paramount. This knowledge will guide which investors you can target and how.
  2. Build a Diverse Funding Strategy: Combine different sources of funding to minimize reliance on any single avenue.
  3. Select the Right Partners: Work with trusted advisors, such as FINRA Broker-Dealers and technology partners, who understand your business and the regulatory environment.
  4. Prepare a Compelling Pitch: Your pitch should resonate with the specific investors you’re targeting, whether they’re angel investors, VC firms, or the public through a crowdfunding campaign.
  5. Leverage Government Grants and Loans: Explore and apply for grants and loans that may be available for your industry or for innovation.
  6. Engage Your Network: Friends and family can be an initial source of capital, often willing to invest in your success.
  7. Utilize JOBS Act Provisions: Understand and leverage the specific regulations under the JOBS Act that best suit your company’s stage and needs.

In the challenging terrain of capital raising, knowledge and strategy are your best allies. The regulatory landscape, embodied by the JOBS Act, provides a roadmap for startups and established companies alike to navigate their way to successful funding. Educating oneself on the myriad sources of capital, understanding the pros and cons of each, and crafting a diversified funding strategy are essential steps. By working with trusted advisors and carefully selecting funding sources, companies can weather the VC winter and emerge with the capital necessary for growth. Remember, the journey of raising capital is complex and multifaceted, but with the right approach and resources, it is navigable. There are no shortcuts, but the path is rich with opportunities for those willing to explore beyond the traditional routes.

 

 

Capital Planning in Healthcare: valuation overview

For industry leaders and entrepreneurs charting the course of their company’s future, understanding the financial aspects of business valuations and fundraising is a strategic asset. 

In this article written by Stephen Brock, CEO of Medical Funding Professionals you’ll gain rich insights on these and other important topics in this area, including an overview on valuation for biotech, medtech, pharma, and life science companies. 

Keep reading and learn more.

First insights: the valuation process

So, to begin our journey, let’s talk about finance, which is a key point that impacts the pathway of any company. 

We all know that this is a broad subject, but one of the main issues is the valuation process. 

A practical example: if you own a company with $25 million in revenue or less, a business valuation can cost you anywhere from $0 (provided by a broker for free) to $40,000* (estimates based on current values at the beginning of 2024). 

There are two main types of valuations you will encounter: 

 

      1. Legal valuations: Legal valuations require the valuation expert to meet specific requirements since it will be used to support legal cases. The person performing the valuation must be certified and the methods they use must follow certain legal standards.
      2. Fair market valuations: When valuing your company a number of data points are built with a few of them being How much your assets are worth The present value of your future cash flows How much common stock is worth at similar (comparable) companies How much equity your company has in other similar businesses or industries, pre and post-money valuations, what does exit value look like, what does a share price project out to be, what comps for M&A and IPO in similar space you work in has occurred, what VC valuations have been printed

 

Attention! Depending on the type of valuation you need and the specifics of your business, the price will fall somewhere in that range.

 

The importance of capital planning

If you’re setting up a company or leading one in areas like BioTech, MedTech, Life sciences or Pharma, it’s important to keep many issues in mind. Especially when you’re aiming to raise money from investors, working strategically is essential.

Among the key points in this context, are creating the company’s structure in a strategic way that can stand out in the market, increasing the potential for attracting investors.

When raising capital in the private markets, seeking professional advice is crucial, working with trustworthy partners the process can be compliant and less stressful.

Solutions for healthcare industry

If you are looking to fundraise without giving up control of your biotech, medtech, pharma, or life science company, you’ll need to find a path to guide your business journey. Medical Funding Professionals developed the Capital Planning Valuation Strategy™ (CPVS™). The method is a custom-prepared funding roadmap and go-to-market strategy, designed to be efficient and straightforward.

One of the main purposes of CPVS is to guide entrepreneurs through each step of the fundraising journey, all with transparency and tailored plans.

Furthermore, the Capital Planning Valuation Strategy™ is designed to meet the unique needs of business owners who prioritize streamlined compliance and sustained leadership in their companies. By offering an alternative to the normative procedures of fundraising, it facilitates a more efficient path to capital acquisition.

Want to know more about the CPVS™ program? You can access the link and get more information directly from Medical Funding Professional’s specialists

What is Entity Management?

In today’s fast-paced business environment, private companies face a myriad of challenges as they scale and seek capital. A crucial, yet often overlooked aspect of their growth trajectory is effective entity management.

This blog post covers the essence of entity management and distinguishes between cap table management and equity management, highlighting the significance of each for private companies.

Entity Management: What does it mean?

Basically, entity management simplifies how organizations track, organize, and manage all details related to their business entities. An effective process helps to ensure compliance and streamline operations, impacting positively in decision-making.

In the next sections, we’ll explore the role of robust entity management software, underscore the potential pitfalls of neglecting this area, and provide insights into selecting a reliable technology partner. Our aim is to equip you with the knowledge to navigate the complexities of entity management, ensuring compliance and facilitating your company’s growth and success.

The Role of Entity Management Software

As private companies expand, particularly those leveraging the JOBS Act Regulations for capital raising, the complexity of regulatory compliance and entity management escalates. Strong entity management involves not just the maintenance of corporate records but ensuring that these entities meet all regulatory requirements timely. This is where the adoption of a comprehensive entity management software becomes invaluable. A technology partner who is adept at understanding the growth dynamics and regulatory landscape can be a linchpin in maintaining compliance, thereby avoiding the repercussions of missed filings or non-compliance.

The Challenges of Inadequate Entity Management

The consequences of not employing effective entity management software can be dire. Missed filings or regulatory non-compliance can severely impact a company’s ability to raise capital, pursue mergers and acquisitions (M&A), or even go public. For sectors like real estate, which typically involves managing multiple entities for various projects, the ripple effects of non-compliance can be even more pronounced. These challenges underscore the necessity of a vigilant approach to entity management.

Choosing a Trusted Entity Management Software Partner

The importance of selecting a trusted software partner cannot be overstated. This partner should not only possess a comprehensive understanding of managing multiple entities but also ensure their software facilitates time and cost savings while keeping up with regulatory deadlines. Here are three red flags to watch out for when choosing an entity management software partner:

Compliance Assurance: Ensure the partner operates with end-to-end compliance. The lack of a robust compliance framework is a major red flag.

Understanding Private Company Challenges: The partner must have a proven track record of understanding and addressing the unique challenges faced by private companies. Lack of expertise in dealing with private company-specific issues is a significant concern.

Reputation and Reliability: Investigate the partner’s reputation and reliability. A partner lacking in trusted testimonials or case studies may not be able to provide the level of service your company requires.

The process of finding a trustworthy company may take some time, but is essential in different aspects of the business. So it’s worth to spend time

Cap Table Management vs. Equity Management

Distinguishing between cap table management and equity management is essential for private companies. Cap table management involves tracking the ownership stakes, types of equity owned, and the dilution effects of future funding rounds. It is a snapshot of who owns what in the company. Equity management, on the other hand, encompasses a broader scope, including managing equity compensation, issuing new shares, and ensuring compliance with tax laws and regulations. Both are critical for effectively managing a company’s equity and ensuring stakeholders are correctly accounted for and rewarded.

Effective entity management is not merely a compliance requirement; it is a strategic imperative for growing private companies. Understanding the nuances between cap table management and equity management, and the importance of each, is crucial. Equally important is the selection of a robust entity management software partner that understands the unique challenges faced by your company and can ensure compliance and efficiency.

Educating yourself on the key considerations and red flags in choosing a technology partner will empower you to make informed decisions. Ultimately this facilitates your company’s growth and success in the complex landscape of private capital markets. Remember, the right questions lead to the right partner, ensuring your company’s entity management is in capable hands.

Digital Asset Ecosystem: Ultimate Guide

Overview of the Digital Assets Ecosystem

In an era where digital assets are redefining the boundaries of technology and finance, understanding the complex landscape of the digital assets ecosystem becomes paramount for companies aiming to leverage these innovations.  We will dive into the critical importance of aligning with a compliant and trusted digital assets ecosystem, offering insights into its transformative potential for private companies in the capital markets.

We explore the historical challenges faced by digital assets, emphasize the necessity of a compliant regulatory framework, and provide practical steps for selecting the right ecosystem. Through anecdotes and expert analysis, we aim to educate and guide you towards making informed decisions in this rapidly evolving sector.

Why Ecosystems for Digital Assets Are Essential

The journey of digital assets in the marketplace is a tale of innovation, ambition, and, unfortunately, a learning curve steeped in regulatory missteps. The initial excitement surrounding Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) gave way to disillusionment as scams proliferated. Similarly, the Non-Fungible Token (NFT) phase, while showcasing the potential for unique asset ownership on the blockchain, also faced its challenges in market acceptance and regulatory clarity. These historical lessons underscore the imperative need for a robust compliance ecosystem from the outset of any digital asset venture.

For private companies venturing into the private capital markets through digital assets, the right ecosystem is not just an advantage—it’s a necessity. This ecosystem must strike a delicate balance between advanced technological frameworks and stringent regulatory compliance.

Practical examples

Also, a good digital ecosystem should encompass a comprehensive regulatory framework, partnerships with legal experts, collaboration with FINRA Broker-Dealers, and blockchain technology that has been vetted and qualified by regulatory bodies.

A prime example of such diligence is KoreChain, which stands out as a pioneering entity that has navigated its blockchain infrastructure through SEC scrutiny, achieving a qualified status under the JOBS Act. This milestone not only highlights KoreChain’s commitment to regulatory compliance but also sets a precedent for what constitutes a trustworthy digital assets ecosystem.

Regulatory frameworks

The digital assets sector faces unique challenges, primarily due to its turbulent history and the evolving regulatory landscape. The shift from ICOs to NFTs and now to a new, regulated phase illustrates the sector’s dynamic nature. The clear message from regulators like the SEC is uncompromising: engagement in digital assets must be 100% compliant. This underscores the critical need for companies to align with digital assets ecosystems that have not only embraced but have been validated by regulatory frameworks. The onus is on companies to rigorously vet potential ecosystems, ensuring they do not fall foul of regulatory mandates.

Collaborating with a trusted digital assets ecosystem instills confidence that your offerings are compliant and that your partners are fully versed in securities law. Such ecosystems prioritize regulatory compliance and include all necessary intermediaries to ensure adherence to securities law.

Trustworthiness in digital assets ecosystem

It is essential for companies to demand evidence of compliance before engaging in any digital assets ecosystem, thereby safeguarding their operations and reputation.

Selecting the right digital assets ecosystem involves a meticulous approach:

Key points Why it matters?
Regulatory Compliance First Prioritize ecosystems that have proven regulatory approval or qualification, such as those that have engaged with regulatory bodies like the SEC. This ensures the foundation of your digital asset ventures is built on solid regulatory ground.
Technology and Infrastructure Scrutiny Evaluate the technological infrastructure of the ecosystem, ensuring it not only supports your operational needs but has also passed regulatory scrutiny. This includes assessing the blockchain technology for security, scalability, and compliance features.
Partnership and Support Ecosystem Look for ecosystems that offer a comprehensive network of partners, including legal experts, regulatory advisors, and broker-dealers. This network is invaluable for navigating the complexities of the digital assets market while ensuring compliance.

As we can see, navigating the digital assets landscape requires a well-informed approach, prioritizing regulatory compliance above all. The lessons learned from the ICO and NFT phases highlight the perils of overlooking regulatory requirements.

Digital Assets Ecosystem: Key Takeaways

As we venture into a new, regulated era of digital assets, the selection of your digital assets ecosystem should be guided by rigorous scrutiny of its regulatory standing, technological robustness, and the support network it offers.

Educating oneself on these aspects is not just advisable; it’s essential for success and compliance in the dynamic world of digital assets.

Remember, starting with technology without a clear understanding of regulatory requirements is a pathway to failure. Instead, choose wisely, ensuring your digital assets journey is both innovative and compliant.

Charter of Trust

Trust, Commitment, and Code of Conduct

This is the Trust Charter describing our commitment to Trust and the Code of Conduct of the Kore group of companies that includes KoreConx, KoreTransfer, and KoreChain.

We believe that TRUST is the cornerstone of any successful business relationship. Our co-founders build this into the DNA of our company.  As we celebrate our 7th year at KoreConX, we are dedicated to upholding the highest ethical standards and fostering an ecosystem of partners who share our commitment to integrity, security, and the responsible handling of information. This business charter outlines our principles of Trust, Commitment, and Code of Conduct, which guide our operations and interactions with clients, partners, and stakeholders. 

The KoreConX Seal of Trust

  • KoreConX will never take a commission, kickback, or revenue share from any of our KorePartners we have integrations with
  • KoreConX will never sell contact information or transaction data
  • KoreConX will never share or disclose individual data to anyone except to those parties who are responsible for working on transactions, following up with investors, performing their fiduciary duties, or performing their regulatory duties
  • KoreConX will never send marketing messages for investments
  • KoreConX will never contact investors in a manner that violates Trust or without the knowledge and consent of the company in which the investors are shareholders

The KoreConX Commitment to Value

  • KoreConX will provide and continually enhance value-added analytics
  • KoreConX will work with its KorePartners to continually reduce business process inefficiencies
  • KoreConX will be relentlessly focused on regulatory compliance and the safety of investors

Trust

  • Privacy Commitment: We pledge to safeguard our clients’ information with the utmost diligence. We will never use or disclose client information in a manner that compromises privacy, security, or business ethics.
  • Data Security: Our company will implement robust data security measures to protect client data from unauthorized access, breaches, or misuse.
  • Transparency: We will maintain transparency with our clients regarding how their information is collected, used, and shared, and we will comply with all applicable data protection laws and regulations.
  • Non-Disclosure: We commit to respecting client confidentiality and will not share sensitive information without explicit consent or legal requirements.

Commitment

  • Ethical Conduct: Our company is committed to conducting business with the highest standards of ethics, honesty, and integrity. We will not engage in any fraudulent, deceptive, or illegal practices.
  • Continuous Improvement: We will continuously improve our infrastructure, processes, and services to provide a safe, efficient, and innovative environment for our clients and partners.
  • Compliance: We will adhere to all applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards relevant to our business operations, including but not limited to financial transactions, data protection, and environmental regulations.
  • Client Satisfaction: We are dedicated to meeting and exceeding client expectations by delivering high-quality services, prompt responses, and personalized support.
  • Compliance & Safety: We will not compromise regulatory compliance and safety to convenience or expediency.

Code of Conduct

  • Partnerships: We have established partnerships with firms and individuals who share our commitment to Trust, ethics, and security. Our KorePartners must adhere to similar principles in their interactions with us and our clients.
  • Fair Competition: We believe in fair competition and will not engage in anticompetitive practices or unfair business tactics. Our partners must also compete fairly in their respective markets.
  • Anti-Corruption: We are resolutely against bribery, corruption, and unethical influence in business. Our company and partners shall not offer, solicit, or accept bribes or engage in any form of corrupt practices.
  • Environmental Responsibility: We acknowledge our responsibility to the environment and will take measures to reduce our environmental footprint. Our partners are encouraged to adopt environmentally responsible practices.
  • Inclusivity: We promote diversity, equity, and inclusivity within our company and encourage our partners to do the same. Discrimination, harassment, or bias in any form will not be tolerated.
  • Conflict Resolution: We are committed to resolving disputes and conflicts promptly, fairly, and through peaceful means. We will seek amicable solutions to disagreements with clients, partners, or stakeholders.
  • Seeking Synergies: We favor win-win and synergystic solutions and partnerships even with parties who believe they are our competitors. Our goal is to remain a technology infrastructure company, and we are open to collaborating with other parties and helping them maintain their brand.

KoreConX aims to create a business environment that is built on trust, commitment to ethical operations, and a shared code of conduct. We invite all our clients, partners, and stakeholders to join us in maintaining and upholding these principles, creating a thriving ecosystem where mutual respect, transparency, and trust are at the core of every interaction.

 

Learn more about the origins of our charter of trust. 

Payment Rails: Cannabis Raising Capital – Navigating the Complex Landscape

In the evolving landscape of the cannabis industry, securing capital through online platforms presents unique challenges, particularly in the realm of payment processing. We explore the intricacies of payment rails for cannabis companies engaging in capital-raising activities under the JOBS Act Regulations (RegCF, RegD, RegA+).

Through anecdotes and analysis, we delve into the reasons behind the sector’s struggle with traditional payment methods, the importance of partnering with knowledgeable payment rails providers, and the specialized hurdles cannabis companies face within the banking world.

We also discuss how partnerships with entities like KoreIssuance having a tightly integrated and well-informed payment solutions partner, can provide a fully compliant pathway for cannabis companies to raise capital online successfully.

By understanding the nuances of this process and recognizing red flags in selecting issuance partners, cannabis companies can position themselves for successful capital-raising.

The Regulatory Landscape for Cannabis Businesses

The cannabis sector in the USA operates in a unique regulatory environment. Despite legalization in numerous states for medicinal or recreational use, cannabis companies face significant operational challenges, particularly regarding payment processing.

Traditional payment systems, such as credit card networks, often exclude cannabis-related transactions due to federal regulations, leaving businesses to rely on less convenient cash transactions or navigate the murky waters of high-risk payment processors.

The Importance of Payment Rails in Cannabis Capital Raising

The distinction between operations and securities offerings is a crucial one in the cannabis industry.

While day-to-day operations might be cash-intensive and largely excluded from traditional banking services, raising capital online operates under a different set of rules and opportunities, particularly under the JOBS Act Regulations (RegD, RegCF, RegA+).

A strong payment rails partner, well-versed in these regulations, can unlock the door to efficient capital raising for cannabis companies by providing the necessary infrastructure to process investments safely and compliantly.

Banking Challenges for Cannabis Companies

Cannabis companies face special challenges within the banking world, not just for their operational needs but also when attempting to raise capital.

The banking industry’s hesitancy to engage with cannabis companies stems from a lack of understanding of the separation between the businesses’ operational aspects and their securities offerings. However, ecosystems like KoreIssuance have made significant strides in educating the banking and payment industries about the unique aspects of cannabis companies raising capital under securities laws.

This education is pivotal in distinguishing the use of payment rails for compliance with securities laws from the broader banking challenges of the cannabis industry.

Partnering with KoreIssuance for Compliant Solutions

Partnering with a trusted issuance partner like KoreIssuance provides cannabis companies with the confidence that all aspects of their capital-raising efforts are managed compliantly.

KoreIssuance, in collaboration with its exclusive payment processing partner, they offer a compliant solution that enables cannabis companies to raise capital confidently.

This partnership allows investors to use credit cards or ACH transfers to invest in cannabis companies, a significant advancement given the industry’s traditional reliance on cash transactions.

Red Flags in Selecting Issuance Partners

When selecting an issuance partner for their offering, cannabis companies should be wary of several red flags:

Comprehensive Compliance: Ensure that the partner operates compliantly end-to-end within the regulatory framework of the JOBS Act and understands the specific compliance requirements of the cannabis sector.

Understanding of Cannabis Challenges: The partner must have a deep understanding of the challenges facing cannabis companies, especially regarding banking and payment processing.

Dedicated Payment Solutions: The issuance partner should have established relationships with banks and payment processors who are fully compliant and willing to support cannabis companies in their capital-raising efforts and provide rates similar to any other business. 

Conclusion: The Importance of trusted partner selection

In conclusion, the importance of educating oneself before selecting an issuance partner cannot be overstated for cannabis companies looking to raise capital. The nuances of compliance, particularly in relation to payment processing under the JOBS Act, demand careful consideration and a thorough vetting process.

By asking the right questions and identifying potential red flags, cannabis companies can forge partnerships that enable them to navigate the complexities of capital raising in this unique sector confidently.

The partnership between KoreIssuance exemplifies the type of collaborative approach that can address the specific needs of cannabis companies, ensuring a compliant, efficient, and successful capital-raising process.

As the cannabis industry continues to grow and evolve, understanding these intricacies and leveraging the right partnerships will be key to unlocking the full potential of online capital-raising efforts.

 

Capital Raising Process: 4 Steps to Start Funding Now

In the dynamic world of private capital markets, raising capital is both an art and a science. We will demystify the capital raising process for private companies, outlining a four-step approach that harmonizes regulatory compliance, technology utilization, and strategic storytelling to attract and engage investors. From navigating the regulatory landscape to leveraging technology for efficient capital raises under the JOBS Act (RegCF, RegD, and RegA+), we explore how to transform the complex journey into a streamlined pathway to funding. By highlighting anecdotes from successful capital raises and the critical role of trusted partners, this guide aims to equip entrepreneurs with the knowledge and tools necessary to embark on their capital raising journey confidently.

Anecdotes of Successful Capital Raising

The journey of capital raising is punctuated with stories of entrepreneurs who turned their visions into reality. From tech startups that secured seed funding through strategic pitches to established companies that leveraged equity crowdfunding for expansion, these stories share a common thread: the ability to articulate a compelling narrative that resonates with investors. These anecdotes not only inspire but also illustrate the practical application of strategic planning and regulatory navigation in the capital raising process.

Leveraging Technology for Compliance and Efficiency

In today’s digital age, technology plays a pivotal role in streamlining the capital raising process. Platforms like KoreIssuance offer a seamless solution for companies to manage their capital raises, ensuring compliance with JOBS Act regulations (RegCF, RegD, RegA+). Post-offering, technologies for shareholder communication and online e-voting, such as Shareholder Communications tools, are invaluable for maintaining transparency and engagement. Additionally, cap table management software is essential for tracking equity ownership and ensuring accurate record-keeping. These technological tools not only simplify compliance but also enhance the investor experience, making it easier for the crowd to invest in promising companies.

Navigating Challenges in Capital-Raising

The path to successful capital raising is fraught with challenges, from understanding the regulatory landscape to attracting potential investors. Entrepreneurs must work with trusted partners, including FINRA Broker-Dealers and technology providers, to navigate these hurdles effectively. One of the most significant challenges is crafting a narrative that captures the essence of the business, reminding companies that investors invest in people first. The story behind the company, its mission, and its vision is what ultimately draws investors in, not just the potential financial returns.

Working with Trusted Partners

The importance of selecting trusted partners for the capital raising journey cannot be overstated. These partners, including regulatory experts, technology providers, and FINRA Broker-Dealers, ensure that the process remains compliant, efficient, and transparent. By providing essential information and guidance, they help companies navigate from start to finish, ensuring that the capital raising process is not only successful but also builds a strong foundation for future investor relations.

Four Steps to Raise Capital

For companies looking to embark on their capital-raising journey, the following four steps provide a roadmap to success:

  1. Understand Regulatory Requirements: Start by gaining a thorough understanding of the JOBS Act regulations (RegCF, RegD, RegA+) and how they apply to your capital raise. This knowledge will guide your strategy and help you select the right regulation for your investor target market.  Here is a great library to get started.
  2. Leverage Technology Platforms: Utilize technology platforms for issuance, shareholder communication, and cap table management. These tools will streamline your process, ensure regulatory compliance, and enhance investor engagement.
  3. Craft a Compelling Narrative: Develop a compelling story that communicates your company’s mission, vision, and value proposition. Remember, your narrative should resonate with potential investors on a personal level, showcasing the people behind the company.
  4. Select Trusted Partners: Work with trusted advisors, intermediaries, and partners who understand the private capital markets and can guide you through the regulatory and operational complexities of capital raising.

Raising capital for a private company, whether a nascent startup or an established entity, requires a blend of strategic planning, regulatory navigation, and genuine storytelling. Understanding the regulations is the first step, providing a framework within which to operate and target the right investors.

Leveraging technology and working with trusted partners streamline the process, ensuring compliance and efficiency. However, the heart of capital raising lies in the ability to connect with investors on a personal level, sharing a vision that inspires and motivates them to join your journey.

As the regulatory landscape and market conditions evolve, continuous education and adaptability remain key. Remember, there are no shortcuts to raising capital, but with the right approach, tools, and partners, your capital raising journey can be a successful and rewarding endeavor.

 

The Broker-Dealer’s Guide to Due Diligence process

In the realm of private capital markets, due diligence is not just a procedure but a pledge—a commitment to uphold integrity, trust, and compliance.  This guide serves as a beacon for Chief Compliance Officers (CCOs) and their compliance teams, guiding them through the complexities of due diligence process in private company capital raises. From leveraging technology to navigating an ever-evolving regulatory landscape, to understanding the nuanced roles of FINRA Broker-Dealers, we delve into how these crucial processes safeguard the private capital markets, ensuring a secure and transparent investment environment for all parties involved.

Due Diligence by Chief Compliance Officers

Imagine a world where investments flow seamlessly, underpinned by an unshakeable trust between investors and companies raising capital. This is the reality that CCOs strive to create through meticulous process of due diligence on companies and investors. Through their diligent efforts, such as scrutinizing a company’s financial health, operational strategies, and leadership integrity, CCOs not only protect investors from unforeseen risks but also build a foundation of trust that is paramount for successful capital raises.

Empowering CCOs with Technology

The digital age has revolutionized due diligence process, providing CCOs with tools to gather and analyze vast amounts of data efficiently. Technologies tailored to regulations like RegCF, RegD, and RegA+ enable CCOs to customize and have still best practices in due diligence processes. Therefore, ensuring that each investigation meets specific regulatory standards. This not only streamlines compliance but also allows CCOs to allocate their resources more effectively, focusing on strategic decision-making rather than getting lost in a sea of paperwork.  CCO’s are the backbone of the firm, and as such technology needs to be part of their overall strategy for the firm to be successful, tools such as Compliance Desk provide the necessary and regulatory requirements of making sure data is collected, tracked, and maintained for CCOs. 

Navigating Challenges of due diligence process in a Dynamic Regulatory Environment

The landscape for FINRA Broker-Dealers is fraught with challenges, from navigating a complex web of regulations to ensuring that compliance teams are equipped with the necessary tools. The advent of technologies like the Compliance Desk represents a significant leap forward, enabling CCOs to maintain organized records in a FINRA-approved facility to meet Rule 17a-4 requirements. This capability is crucial for broker-dealers to manage their compliance efficiently, allowing them to focus on expanding their business while maintaining strict regulatory adherence.

The Critical Role of FINRA Broker-Dealers

FINRA Broker-Dealers are the guardians of the private capital markets, and their role extends beyond initial best practices on the due diligence process; they help to ensure the safety and integrity of transactions for investors, companies, and intermediaries alike. Once an offering goes live, they are responsible for continuous oversight, including KYC, AML, suitability, and investor verification. This dual focus on company and investor due diligence is essential for preventing bad actors from entering the market, thereby protecting the investment ecosystem.

7 Steps for Effective Due Diligence on Private Companies

For those aiming to enhance their due diligence processes or embarking on the journey to become a FINRA Broker-Dealer,  consider the following steps:

  1. Comprehensive Regulatory Understanding: Gain a deep understanding of the relevant regulations (RegCF, RegD, RegA+) and their implications for your due diligence process.
  2. Robust Data Collection and Analysis: Leverage technology to efficiently collect and analyze company data, focusing on financials, management, and operational integrity.
  3. Risk Assessment: Develop a framework for assessing and categorizing potential risks, including financial, legal, and operational risks.
  4. Management and Operational Evaluation: Conduct thorough evaluations of the company’s management team and operational capabilities to ensure they have the necessary expertise and resources.  Always do bad actor checks on the company and the principles of the company.
  5. Legal Compliance Verification: Verify the company’s compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including securities laws and industry-specific regulations.
  6. Continuous Monitoring: Establish processes for ongoing monitoring of the company’s performance and compliance post-investment.
  7. Record Keeping and Reporting: Implement systems for maintaining detailed records of your due diligence process, ensuring they meet FINRA’s Rule 17a-4 requirements for record-keeping.

Best practices on due diligence for broker-dealers

In the rapidly evolving landscape of private capital markets, the importance best practices on due diligence for broker-dealers cannot be overstated.

It is the bedrock upon which trust and compliance are built, safeguarding the interests of investors and ensuring the integrity of the market. For FINRA Broker-Dealers and their compliance teams, staying abreast of regulatory changes and leveraging technology are key to navigating this complex environment effectively.

So, by creating a comprehensive guide of due diligence best practices that align with current regulations and anticipate future shifts, firms can not only comply with today’s standards but also set a benchmark for excellence in compliance and investor protection. As we move forward, education and adaptability will remain crucial for all stakeholders in the private capital markets, ensuring that they can meet today’s challenges and seize tomorrow’s opportunities.

Image of two professional using a platform for broker-dealers in a tablet

2024 Funding Guide: Top 7 Loan Alternatives for Startups

Loan Alternatives for Startups

Getting money to start a business is a critical issue that entrepreneurs have to deal. Sometimes the landscape seems so uncertain that a lot of them think of paying astronomical taxes to get the capital and get the idea off the drawing board.

But beyond traditional bank loans, there are a lot of loan alternatives for startups waiting to be explored. This guide will show you different funding options, empowering you with more knowledge to unfoggy the landscape.  Therefore, you’ll have more resources to think about which alternative may fit your business.

From innovative crowdfunding to strategic partnerships with angel investors, we’ll delve into the diverse funding ecosystem, equipping you with the knowledge to make informed decisions.

For startups and companies looking to get money to fund their business, there are many different options. While not every option may be best suited for every company, understanding each will help to choose which one is best for them. 

Family and friends

In the early stages of seeking loan alternatives for Startups, investment from family and friends can be both a simple and safe solution. Since family members and friends likely want to see you succeed, they are potential sources of funding.

Unlike traditional investors, family and friends do not need to register as an investor to donate. It is also likely that through this method, founders may not have to give up some of their equity. This allows them to retain control over their company. 

Angel investors

Angel investors and angel groups can also be a source of getting capital to fund your business.  Angel investors can be either non-accredited and accredited investors, for accredited investors there is an additional step to meet SEC regulations to make sure they have been verified. Angel groups are multiple angel investors who have pooled their money together to invest in startups. Typically, angel investors invest capital in exchange for equity and may play a role as a mentor, anticipating a return on their investment. 

Venture capital

Venture capital investors are SEC-regulated and invest in exchange for equity in the company. However, they are not investing their own money, rather investing other people’s. Since venture capital investors are trying to make money from their investments, they typically prefer to have some say in the company’s management, likely reducing the founders’ control. 

Strategic investors

Strategic investors may also be an option for companies. Typically owned by larger corporations, strategic investors invest in companies that will strengthen the corporate investor or that will help both parties grow. Strategic investors usually make available their connections or provide other resources that the company may need. This makes them our forth alternative to loans for startups.

Startup accelerator programs

Another way to get money for your business without getting a loan, is through startup accelerator programs

For some companies, crowdfunding may be useful for raising money. With this method, companies can either offer equity or rewards to investors, the latter allowing the company to raise the money they need without giving up control of the company. 

Getting capital to fund your business: Regulations for crowdfunding

Through the JOBS Act, the SEC passed Regulation A+ crowdfunding, which allows entities to raise up to $75 million in capital from both accredited and non-accredited investors. Crowdfunding gives access to a wider pool of potential investors, making it possible to secure the funding they need through this method. 

Alternatively, Regulation CF may be a better fit. Through RegCF, companies can raise up to $5 million, during a 12-month, period from anyone looking to invest. This gives an important opportunity to turn their loyal customers into shareholders as well. These types of offerings must be done online through an SEC-registered intermediary, like a funding portal or broker-dealer.

In the March 2021 update to the regulation, investment limits for accredited investors were removed and investment limits for non-accredited investors were revised to be $2,500 or 5% of the greater of annual income or net worth. It is also important to note that now, issuers (those seeking funding) can now “test the waters” to gauge interest before registering the offering with the SEC. Additionally, the use of special purpose vehicles (SPVs) within RegCF offerings was permitted.

Regulation D is another method that private companies can use to raise capital. Through RegD, some companies are allowed to sell securities without registering the offering with the SEC. However, if you choose to raise capital through RegD, you must electronically file the SEC’s “Form D.” By meeting either RegD exemptions 506(b) or 506(c), issuers can raise an unlimited amount of capital. To meet the requirements of the 506(b) exemption, companies must not use general solicitation to advertise securities, can raise money from an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 other sophisticated investors, and must determine the information to provide investors while adhering to anti-fraud securities laws. For 506(c) exemptions, companies can solicit and advertise an offering but all investors must be accredited. In this case, the company must reasonably verify that the investor meet the SEC’s accredited investor requirements  

Direct offerings

Another loan alternative is to utilize direct offerings to raise money. Through a direct offering, companies can issue shares to the company directly to investors, without having to undergo an initial public offering (IPO). Since a direct offering is typically cheaper than an IPO, companies can raise funding without having major expenses. Since trading of shares bought through a direct offering is typically more difficult than those bought in an IPO, investors may request higher equity before they decide to invest. 

Security tokens

Companies can offer security tokens to investors through an issuance platform. Companies should be aware that these securities are required to follow SEC regulations. It is becoming more common for companies to offer securities through an issuance platform, as it allows them to reach a larger audience than traditional methods. This is also attractive to investors, as securities can be traded in a secondary market, providing them with more options and liquidity for their shares. 

Getting funds with a broker-dealer assistance

Additionally, companies looking to raise capital can do so with the help of a broker-dealer. Broker-dealers are SEC-registered entities that deal with transactions related to securities, as well as buying and selling securities for their own account or those of their customers. Plus, certain states require issuers to work with a broker-dealer to offer securities, so working with a broker-dealer allows issuers to maintain compliance with the SEC and other regulatory entities. This makes it likely that a company raising capital already has an established relationship with a broker-dealer. 

Funding through website

Lastly, companies looking to raise capital can do it directly through their website. With the KoreConX all-in-one platform, companies can raise capital at their website, maintaining their brand experience. The platform allows companies to place an “invest now” button on their site throughout their RegA, RegCF, RegD, or other offerings so that potential investors can easily invest. 

 

Whichever loan alternatives for startups you choose, it must make sure that it aligns with the company’s goals. Without understanding each method, it is possible that founders may end up being asked to give up too much equity and lose control of the company they have worked hard to build. Companies should approach the process of raising capital with a strategy already in place so that they can be satisfied with the outcome. 

 

*Disclaimer: This article was last reviewed in January 2024. Please note that regulatory landscapes and requirements are subject to rapid changes. The information provided here is reflective of the early part of 2024.

What is a Broker-Dealer?

We are diving into the world of FINRA Broker-Dealers – a crucial component in maintaining the integrity and trustworthiness of the private capital markets. We’ll explore their role, significance, and the technology that powers them, providing an overview of the challenges they face and their importance in safeguarding investors, companies, and intermediaries. 

We’ll also offer practical steps for those interested in becoming a FINRA Broker-Dealer, highlighting the ongoing responsibilities and the necessity of understanding the compliance landscape.

What is a broker-dealer?

Basically, a broker-dealer is a critical player in the financial landscape, serving as an intermediary that buys and sells securities for both clients and their own accounts. In essence, they facilitate the flow of capital by connecting investors with opportunities.

For people aiming to raise capital or just wanting to deep their knowledge, understanding the function and value of broker-dealers is important. As we’ll see in the next section, broker-dealers not only ensure transactions are executed efficiently but also uphold regulatory compliance, safeguarding the integrity of the capital markets and enhancing investor confidence.

Roles of a Broker-Dealer

Imagine you’re planning to climb a challenging mountain. Would you go alone or with an experienced guide? In the world of capital raising, FINRA Broker-Dealers are akin to these indispensable guides.

Therefore, one of major roles of a broker-dealer is to bring expertise and trustworthiness, ensuring that companies operate in compliance with regulations while securing capital.

An excellent example is when a startup, brimming with innovative ideas but new to the regulatory landscape, partners with a FINRA Broker-Dealer. This partnership not only enhances the credibility of the startup in the eyes of investors but also ensures adherence to the stringent regulatory framework, building a foundation of trust and reliability.  

The Pillars of the Private Capital Market

With over 3,000 registered FINRA Broker-Dealers in the USA, these entities are not just numerous; they are vital cogs in the financial ecosystem. They play a critical role in ensuring that capital markets operate smoothly, efficiently, and, most importantly, within the boundaries of securities law. Their presence bolsters investor confidence, knowing that there’s a regulatory watchguard ensuring fair and transparent transactions.

At KoreConX we only work with registered FINRA Broker-Dealers to utilize our infrastructure to make sure we provide and end to end compliant transactions for all participants in the transaction.

Broker-Dealer Compliance

The advent of the JOBS Act brought about a seismic shift in how private capital is raised, particularly for startups and small businesses. FINRA Broker-Dealers have been at the forefront of adopting technology to leverage these regulations efficiently. They use sophisticated platforms from KoreConX for tasks like conducting due diligence, monitoring transactions, and ensuring compliance with the JOBS Act and crowdfunding regulations. This technological integration not only streamlines processes but also enhances the accuracy and effectiveness of compliance measures.

Navigating Current Challenges

Despite their expertise and technological prowess, FINRA Broker-Dealers face an evolving landscape of challenges. The rapid pace of regulatory changes, the increasing complexity of financial products, and the need for advanced cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive data are just a few of the hurdles. Adapting to these changes while maintaining the highest standards of compliance and investor protection is a balancing act that requires constant vigilance and adaptability.

Safeguarding the Capital Market Ecosystem

The role of a FINRA Broker-Dealer transcends mere compliance. They are the guardians of market integrity, playing a pivotal role in ensuring a safe and fair environment for all participants – investors, companies, and intermediaries. Their work upholds the principles of transparency and fairness, which are fundamental to the health and stability of the private capital markets.

How to become a FINRA Broker-Dealer: Step-by-Step

  1. Understand the Regulatory Framework: Before embarking on this journey, it’s crucial to have a thorough understanding of the FINRA rules, SEC regulations, and other relevant laws. This knowledge is the foundation upon which your Broker-Dealer operations will be built.
  2. Obtain the Necessary Licenses: Register with FINRA, pass the required exams (like the Series 7 and Series 63), and meet the net capital requirements. This step is about more than just fulfilling legal obligations; it’s about equipping yourself with the tools and knowledge necessary for effective compliance and operation.  Once you have the people the firm also needs to add business line items such as RegCF, RegA+, digital securities to be able to transact in the private capital markets.
  3. Implement Robust Compliance and Technological Systems: Set up systems for ongoing compliance, including technology for record-keeping, reporting, and monitoring transactions. Remember, becoming a Broker-Dealer is not just about starting; it’s about maintaining and continuously improving your operations and compliance posture.  FINRA has requirements where information can be hosted that FINRA Broker-Dealers must follow, we are KoreConX follow these guidelines so FINRA Broker-Dealers can transact with confidence.

 

Educating for a Better Financial Future

Embarking on the journey to become a FINRA Broker-Dealer is not just about fulfilling a regulatory role; it’s about committing to the ongoing responsibility of maintaining licenses, staying abreast of regulatory changes, and undertaking permissible activities. This role is crucial in safeguarding the interests of all parties involved in the private capital markets, thereby ensuring a stable, transparent, and fair financial ecosystem.

Understanding the requirements and responsibilities of being a FINRA Broker-Dealer is vital for anyone considering this path. It’s a commitment to excellence, continuous learning, and an unwavering dedication to maintaining the integrity of the capital markets. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of private investing, the role of the FINRA Broker-Dealer remains more important than ever, acting as a beacon of trust, compliance, and stability in the dynamic world of finance.

 

Protecting shareholder rights: Can transfer agents save democracy?

In today’s article, we’ll talk about the key role of transfer agents in protecting shareholder rights and corporate governance. Especially when it comes to potential threats from powerful actors like oligarchs or governments.

Introduction

A long time ago in what seems like a different universe, I was working on an IPO for a company that will have to remain unidentified in a country that never experienced Enlightenment thinking.

The company’s CEO and majority owner decided to challenge the local dictator’s political leadership. Dictator X didn’t take kindly to that and decided that a change of ownership of the company was in order.

One of the ways he did that was to simply change the share register. “All your shares are belong to me”, he goes. 

And the keeper of the register does not challenge that because at least one person has already shown up dead in a quarry at that point.

We need to talk about protecting shareholder rights. 

It’s worth to consider

I’m not suggesting that anything like that is happening here yet. But I am worrying about the sanctity of the share register for a couple of reasons. 

First, the political environment suggests that many places might be moving towards a more dirigiste system with more political interference into the conduct of companies, with companies being penalized for behavior or policies the political leadership disapproves of.

Second, in our own industry, I’ve seen instances where issuers and gatekeepers (including lawyers) are looking for easy solutions to the existence of inconvenient shareholders. For example, trying to “reverse” the sale of shares that has already taken place by returning the money because of some compliance failure in an offering. Or trying to “cash out” non-accredited shareholders in an acquisition transaction that runs into the “Rule 145 problem” where registering or finding an available exemption is impossible or inconvenient.

Protecting shareholder rights

Here’s the thing. A share is a bundle of economic and governance rights. Some of those rights are specified by the corporate laws of the state in which a company is incorporated. Some of those rights are set out in the bylaws. State law dictates how rights granted to shareholders may be modified. If a company (or a potential acquiror of the company) finds that having a large number of shareholders, or having non-accredited shareholders, is not part of its plan, then it can only remove them through prescribed means in accordance with corporate law. Neither they nor their agents can just wipe out a shareholder’s rights by throwing money at them if the ability to do so is not specified in law.

Transfer agents, please guard the share registers you are entrusted with. You may be the first line of defense against oligarchs. You are certainly the defender of retail investors.

You should be making sure that transfer of (or cancellation of) ownership is made according to the law. If someone wants to remove a shareholder on your register, make sure you have legal advice that says you can do that.

Also, does anyone have an opinion on whether a blockchain-only register would make this issue better or worse?

*This text was originally published on Crowdcheck.

How to choose the right trusted cap table provider

In the dynamic landscape of private companies, managing and maintaining an accurate and reliable capitalization table (Cap Table) is paramount. A Cap Table is a detailed ledger that outlines the ownership structure of a company, showcasing the distribution of equity among shareholders. As private companies grow and undergo various funding rounds, mergers, and acquisitions, having a trusted cap table provider becomes indispensable. 

What most entrepreneurs do not realize is the importance of the cap table until they are engaging in a transaction of raising capital, M&A, or going public.   Your company’s cap table becomes the deal breaker if you are not ready. 

This blog explores the significance of a reliable Cap Table and the advantages it brings to private companies when working with a 3rd party provider.

What is a Cap Table Provider?

A Cap Table Provider is a third-party entity that specializes in maintaining and managing your company’s cap table. Their primary role is to ensure that your cap table is accurate, up-to-date, and compliant with all relevant laws and regulations.

This service is especially crucial in the context of raising capital online, where multiple investors may be involved. 

A cap table provider has to follow securities and privacy laws, also assuring companies of Trust, this is not any law but its clear that you are trusting a provider with your most valuable assets to manage. 

What Do They Provide?

Cap table providers need to offer a range of services designed to streamline the complex process of cap table management for private companies. These services typically include:

→ Initial Setup: They will help you create your cap table from scratch, ensuring that all equity and securities are accurately recorded from day one.

→ Transaction Tracking: Providers keep a detailed record of all equity transactions, including investments, stock issuances, option grants, warrants, safe, saft, notes, digital securities, NFT, and more.

→ Compliance Monitoring: They ensure that your cap table adheres to all legal and regulatory requirements, including securities laws, tax laws, and accounting standards.

→ Scenario Modeling “Waterfalls”: Cap table providers can help you run “what-if” scenarios to understand the impact of various financial decisions on equity ownership and dilution.  This is often referred to as “waterfall” modeling.

→ Shareholder Reporting: They generate reports and statements for your investors, making it easier to communicate and maintain transparency.  Very important element to make sure reports such as K1, dividends, AGM etc are delivered in a timely manner.

Valuation Management: Providers assist in tracking the valuation of your company over time, which is vital for determining the worth of individual equity stakes.  For private companies 409a reporting is critical and also mandated.

→ Exit Planning: As your company grows, they help you prepare for exit events such as mergers, acquisitions, or initial public offerings (IPOs).

Why It’s Important to Work with a 3rd Party Provider

Choosing a trusted cap table provider is not just an option; it’s a strategic necessity for any private company, especially those raising capital online and utilizing the JOBS Act Regulations such as RegCF, RegD, and RegA+. Here’s why:

1. Expertise and Accuracy

Cap table management requires specialized knowledge of securities laws, tax regulations, and accounting standards. A third-party provider brings expertise to the table, ensuring your cap table is accurate and compliant, reducing the risk of costly errors.  Today, the movement of securities such as transfers and trades you need experts to maintain your book of records accurate.

2. Scalability

As your company grows, managing your cap table becomes increasingly complex. A provider has the resources and tools to handle the growing complexity, allowing you to focus on your core business operations.

3. Transparency

A third-party provider adds a layer of transparency between your company and its investors. This transparency fosters trust and confidence, vital for attracting and retaining shareholders.

4. Security and Confidentiality

Your cap table contains sensitive information about your shareholders and the financial health of your company. Trusting a third-party provider with this data ensures that it remains secure and confidential.  TRUST is not technology, TRUST is not regulations, TRUST needs to be the DNA of the company.

5. Regulatory Compliance

Securities laws and regulations are constantly evolving. A cap table provider stays updated with these changes, helping your company stay compliant and avoid legal issues.

Choosing a trusted cap table provider

Perhaps the most critical aspect of choosing a cap table provider is TRUST. Your company is entrusting the provider with one of its most valuable assets: its shareholders. Here’s why trust is of utmost importance:

Factor Description
Confidentiality A trusted cap table provider understands the importance of keeping your shareholder information confidential. They have robust security measures in place to safeguard this data from unauthorized access or breaches. Not only managing securely but making sure the provider is not using your data.
Accuracy Errors in your cap table can lead to disputes, legal issues, and even damage your company’s reputation. Trustworthy providers have rigorous quality control processes in place to ensure the accuracy of your cap table.
Responsiveness In the fast-paced world of business, you need a provider who is responsive to your needs. Trustworthy providers prioritize client communication and support, ensuring your concerns are addressed promptly.
Compliance Trustworthy providers are well-versed in securities regulations and take compliance seriously. They help your company stay on the right side of the law, reducing the risk of regulatory trouble. A cap table provider should provide your company with a TRUST document that is beyond external regulatory compliance.
Reputation A provider’s reputation matters. Check their track record, client testimonials, and industry reputation to ensure they have a history of delivering quality service.

For CEOs, Presidents, CFOs, COOs, Chief Legal Counsel, and Lawyers, selecting a trusted cap table provider is a strategic decision that can greatly impact your company’s success, especially when raising capital online.

The right provider offers TRUST, expertise, scalability, transparency, and security. Above all, TRUST between your company and the provider is paramount, as they safeguard your most valuable assets—your shareholders. By choosing a reputable provider, you can navigate the complex world of cap table management with confidence, knowing that your financial records are in capable hands.

Reg S vs online offerings: key issues

In the complex sphere of securities, the SEC’s Regulation S holds significant importance, but it is frequently misunderstood by many in the industry. Therefore, having a clear understanding about its role is essential for to be well-informed and avoid misconceptions.

 

Introduction

We often hear suggestions that a Reg S offering be added to an offering being made under one of the online offering exemptions (Reg A, Reg CF or Rule 506(c) under Reg D). This is very rarely a good idea. Reg S sits very uneasily with the online exemptions. Although the conditions under which such offerings can be made using general solicitation vary, each of them can use general solicitation. Reg S offerings cannot.

Reg S requires that offers and sales be made in an “offshore transaction”, which means no offer can be made to a person in the United States and that you have to know or reasonably believe that any buyer of securities is physically located outside the United States. Additionally, “directed selling efforts” in the United States are prohibited.

Eye on compliance!

Directed selling efforts are much broader than general solicitation, including any activities that “condition the market” and would include not just advertising, but also person-to-person sales communications.

The type of communications permitted under the online offering exemptions would generally blow both the offshore transaction requirement and the directed selling effort prohibition. As we all know, the term “offer” is interpreted very broadly in US securities law.

If you are making an offering under multiple “exemptions”, even if you don’t mention the Reg S offering, the SEC is likely to take the view that general solicitation activities will result in conditioning the market for the Reg S offering. The Staff has certainly asked issuers making offerings under several exemptions contemporaneously for an “integration” analysis – explaining why various communications should not be treated as resulting in the several offerings being treated as essentially one plan of financing.

Efforts to argue to the Staff that one communication relates to one offering, and another communication relates to an offering under a different exemption have been met with a robust skepticism, and the Staff have often seemed to take the view that communications for multiple offerings cross-market each other. This would be even more the case if one of the offerings were being made under Reg S, where the “market conditioning” prohibition is baked into the rule.

Mentioning the Reg S offering in communications in the United States, would of course be a violation of the “no offers in the United States” requirement. But if you didn’t mention it, you would run the risk of omitting disclosure of a material fact.

Reg S and Online Offerings: think twice

Although its technically possible, is rarely adding a Reg S element to any offering being made under an online offering exemption. It’s reasonable consider that if you did want to add Reg S, you would need a geofenced offering site accessible only to persons outside the United States.

You need a separate set of offering docs (to comply with the other conditions of Reg S, which I haven’t even touched on here). And you would need to ensure that no-one who invested came to the offering because of all the communications you used in the other offerings – the LinkedIn ads, the TikTok videos, the Insta pics, the You Tube videos. And that’s a difficult task.

And bear in mind that even if you were to structure an offering to meet the requirements of Reg S, you would still need to consider compliance with the securities laws of the countries your investors are from, as you would with any of the other “exemptions”.

In most cases, from a practical point of view, you are better off relying on the usual online offering exemptions, even to accommodate non-US investors.

 

* Credits: Sara Hanks, CrowdCheck.

Canada 45-106 Reporting Obligations

Raising capital as a company can be an exciting step, but understanding some particularities of the area is not always so easy. One crucial aspect is understanding prospectus requirements, detailed legal documents outlining a security offering.

Regulation 45-106, a game-changer for Canadian companies by offering “exemptions” from this requirement, but it’s not a free pass, it has specific conditions.

Curious? Keep reading and check practical aspects about Canada 45-106 Reporting Obligations.

Introduction

Regulation 45-106, also known as National Instrument 45-106, is a key piece of Canadian securities law that governs exemptions from issuing a prospectus (a detailed legal document) for companies raising capital.

It outlines specific scenarios where companies can offer and sell securities without a prospectus, often referred to as “exemptions.” This streamlines the process for both companies and investors by reducing documentation and administrative burdens.

However, using these exemptions doesn’t mean companies get a free pass. Regulation 45-106 also imposes reporting requirements on companies that utilize these exemptions, typically those raising capital through private placements (selling shares to a limited group of accredited investors). These reports serve two main purposes:

 

  • Transparency: Provide investors and regulators with detailed information about the company and its securities offering, enabling informed investment decisions and ensuring everyone has access to essential facts.

 

  • Investor protection: Uphold a high standard of market integrity by deterring fraud and ensuring investors are treated fairly.

 

Therefore, Regulation 45-106 balances streamlined capital raising with essential investor protection by allowing exemptions under specific conditions but requiring reporting to maintain transparency and safeguard investor interests.

Filing Form 45-106: don’t forget this!

As we talked in the previous section, the National Instrument 45-106 is a securities regulation in Canada that governs prospectus and registration exemptions for issuers and investors. 

In this context, it sets out various exemptions from the prospectus requirement for the issuance and trading of securities, along with specific reporting obligations for companies that rely on these exemptions.

The reporting requirements for companies under Regulation 45-106 primarily apply to issuers who issue securities under specific exemptions, such as the private placement exemptions. The reporting obligations aim to provide investors and regulators with information about the issuers and their securities offerings, ensuring transparency and investor protection.

What is 45-106 filing?  

Summing up, the 45-106 filing is a mandatory reporting process in Canadian securities regulations. It involves submitting a form with detailed information about the issuer, security, exemptions, offering amount, and investors. 

Let’s take a closer look.

  • Form 45-106F1 – Report of Exempt Distribution:
    • Issuers who rely on certain prospectus exemptions (e.g., private placements) to issue securities in Canada must file a Form 45-106F1 – Report of Exempt Distribution.
    • This report must be filed with the applicable securities regulatory authority in each Canadian jurisdiction where the distribution occurred.
    • The Form 45-106F1 contains details about the issuer, the type of security issued, exemptions relied upon, the offering amount, and information about the investors.

Regulation 45-106 Compliance: best practices

Seeking professional assistance to fill out the forms and solve questions about your business and 45-106 is a key aspect and might be considered since the beginning of the process.

It’s crucial for companies and issuers to understand the specific reporting requirements associated with the exemptions used and to ensure timely and accurate filings to meet their regulatory obligations. Compliance with reporting requirements under Regulation 45-106 contributes to maintaining transparency in the Canadian capital markets and supports investor confidence. Companies should seek guidance from legal and financial professionals familiar with Canadian securities regulations to navigate these obligations effectively.

 

RegS SEC Reporting Obligations

Regulation S (RegS) is a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulation that provides a safe harbor from the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 for certain offerings and sales of securities outside the United States. Regulation S applies to offerings that are conducted entirely outside of the United States, targeting non-U.S. persons.

Under Regulation S, there are no specific ongoing reporting requirements imposed by the SEC for companies conducting offerings and sales of securities to non-U.S. persons. However, there are certain provisions and considerations associated with Regulation S offerings:

  • Safe Harbor for Offshore Offerings: Regulation S provides a safe harbor exemption for securities offerings and sales that occur entirely outside of the United States. This exemption applies to both equity and debt securities and allows companies to conduct offshore offerings without registering with the SEC.
  • Restrictions on Resale of Securities: Securities sold in compliance with Regulation S have restrictions on their resale into the United States for a specific period. Typically, there’s a holding period of one year for restricted securities sold in offshore transactions under Regulation S.   The securities must be offered only to non-us citizens and the offering must be IP blocked if the company is raising its technology online.

 

  • Disclosure Requirements: While Regulation S exempts offerings from SEC registration, companies are still subject to anti-fraud provisions. Companies conducting offerings under Regulation S should provide all material information necessary for investors to make informed investment decisions.

 

  • Securities Act Compliance: Even though there are no specific ongoing reporting requirements to the SEC for Regulation S offerings, companies are required to comply with other provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, particularly regarding anti-fraud and anti-manipulation provisions.

 

  • Compliance with Foreign Jurisdictions: Companies conducting Regulation S offerings might need to comply with the securities laws and regulations of the foreign jurisdictions where the offerings are made. This may include filing requirements or compliance with local laws.  Companies need to make sure they are checking with local securities regulators or securities lawyers to ensure they are not offside with using Reg S.

It’s important for companies engaging in RegS offerings to understand the specific requirements of the regulation and ensure compliance not only with SEC regulations but also with the securities laws of the foreign jurisdictions involved. Companies should seek guidance from legal and financial professionals experienced in cross-border offerings to navigate the complexities and compliance obligations associated with Regulation S offerings.

What are blue sky laws and why are they important?

When it comes to investments, people like a clear sky rather than clouds of uncertainty. That’s where the Blue Sky Laws come in – a set of state regulations and rules to maintain a clear and safe financial atmosphere. From registration requirements to anti-fraud measures, these laws have a big impact on investor protection.

Keep reading and learn all the details.

Table of Contents

 

What are blue sky laws?

Basically, Blue Sky Laws are state regulations made to safeguard investors from fraudulent securities activities. This legislation controls the sale of securities, such as stocks and bonds, within a specific state. Overall, it refers to a key instrument for ensuring transparency and protecting investors in the market.

Originating in the aftermath of the Great Depression, “blue sky laws” were made possible by the Uniform Securities Act of 1956. Leading up to the stock market crash of 1929, the SEC did not exist to regulate offerings and many investment deals offered great profits to increase their sale.

Today, this legislation plays a central role in regulating offerings and safeguarding investors against fraud. For companies offering securities to investors, understanding the role they play will be key to a successful offering. 

The purpose of the Uniform Securities Act was to provide individual states the ability to implement their own securities laws. As some securities may not be covered at the federal level, giving states the power to enact blue sky laws to protect investors .

Today, 40 out of the 50 states have implemented blue sky laws based on the Uniform Securities Act.

Ensuring investor protection

The blue sky laws also create provisions for liability and may allow investors to bring lawsuits against issuers in the event of fraud.

Since the blue sky laws were established to protect investors, the laws enacted by each affect the registration of securities, registration of issuer and brokers, as well as the state’s ability to regulate and enforce restrictions.

Companies must register securities in both their home state and any other state in which it intends to do business. However, laws can vary between states; while the language they use can be similar, the interpretations may vary.

For issuers, this is an important fact to note, as they must meet each state’s requirement for each state they intend to sell securities in. 

Blue sky laws vs. regulations

In 1996, Congress passed the National Securities Market Improvement Act which exempts certain securities from state regulation and returns the regulation of broker-dealer registration to federal control. As a reaction to transactions being more difficult for companies because of the requirement to comply with blue sky laws, the Act reduced the power of individual states to regulate securities. 

While the federal government plays a major role in securities regulation, understanding the laws in each state which a company intends to sell securities is still essential.

For companies looking to raise money through Reg A+, Tier I offerings must be reviewed and registered with both the SEC and state governments.

Tier II offerings do not need to be reviewed by the state for them to be sold. In both cases, states retain the ability to investigate and charge issuers with fraud, so maintaining compliance will promote not only investor protection but will protect the company too.

Additionally, issuers and brokers must still adhere to notice and filing requirements set for each state. 

Your Shield Against Investment Fraud

With an understanding of blue sky laws, companies can plan for a successful offering by following regulations set in place by each state. Failure to comply with the laws can result in severe consequences and penalties.

While it may seem like an overwhelming task, state securities regulators can be contacted to ensure that your offering meets their requirements or better yet reach out to your securities lawyer who will guide you through depending on what regulation your company wants to use for its offering such as RegCF or RegD or RegA+, each one will have different provisions that you will need to follow to make sure you are compliant with your offering.

What do I need for a Reg A+ Offering to be successful?

A successful Regulation A+ (Reg A+) offering requires careful planning and execution. Understanding the key components needed for a successful RegA+ offering is crucial for companies seeking to raise capital.

The comprehension of these components and how to utilize them effectively is a game changer.  This way, the future issuer can significantly increase its chances of making a compelling and successful offer.

In this blog post, we will explore key aspects for companies seeking growth through RegA+, providing valuable insights for companies navigating this fundraising strategy.

 

Hands-on: Reg A+ Offerings

If your company is looking to raise funds, you’ve probably considered many options for doing so. One notable development in the financial landscape is the introduction of Regulation A+ by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) through the JOBS Act.

This regulatory framework has empowered companies to raise substantial amounts of up to $75 million in funding rounds, with participation open to both accredited and non-accredited investors. This expansion presents a significant opportunity for businesses to access capital from a wider range of potential backers.

If you have decided to move forward with a RegA+ offering, you’ve probably become familiar with the proces. However, what are the essential components that will contribute to the success of your offering?

Companies that are using RegA+ as a way to raise capital for their companies are successful.  However, in 2022 and 2023 we saw increased activity by the SEC targeting RegA+ companies.  So, to be truly successful, you need to read the items below so you do not fall victim to the SEC.

 

Compliance: Secure Your Reg A+ Offering

It’s important to understand you can have the best company ever and the most successful offering, but if you do not follow the regulations while you are raising the funds, your company might be sanctioned by the SEC or the company will need to refund investors.  

To be 100% compliant you need to be working with partners (legal, audit, FINRA Broker-Dealer, technology, marketing and PR) that can assure you that none of their RegA+ clients have been penalized by the SEC. This is a major Red Flag if they are associated.

Remember this, your partners for your offering do not get the penalties from the SEC. Rather, you and your company do! You get listed as a “Bad-Actor”. Now you need to do your homework and only work with partners who will not introduce risk into your offering.

 

* Bad Actor: (…) those who seek to evade regulatory requirements and harm investors for their own personal gain.

Font: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)

 

Marketing strategies for issuers 

Since the SEC allows RegA+ offerings to be freely advertised, your company will need a  marketing budget to spread the word about your fundraising efforts. If no one knows that you’re raising money, how can you actually raise money? 

Once you’ve established a budget, knowing your target will be the next important step. If your company’s brand already has loyal customers, they are likely the easiest target for your fundraising campaign. Customers who already love your brand will be excited to invest in something that they care about. 

After addressing marketing strategies for attracting investments in your company’s offering, creating the proper terms for the offering will also be essential. Since one of the main advantages of RegA+ is that it allows companies to raise money from everyday people, having terms that are easy for them to understand without complex knowledge of investments and finance will have a wider appeal. Potential investors can invest in a company with confidence when they can easily understand what they are buying. 

 

Cost of Raising Capital

The cost of doing an offering for RegA+ has spiked once again in the past few years. Here is what you need to know and watch out for.  It’s the small items that add up.  Do not be fooled by statements like “you are high risk.” Remember, you are NOT high risk.  You have been qualified by the SEC to raise your capital compliantly

Description Costs
Legal Form 1 A Preparations $35,000 – $75,000 (unchanged for the past 4 years)
Audit $2,500+ (unchanged for the past 4 years)
FINRA Broker-Dealer 1-3% (some firms offer capabilities beyond compliance)
FINRA 5110 Fees unchanged
Escrow $1,000 (fees decreasing; paying more is excessive)
Credit Card Max 2.8% (no company qualified for RegA+ should pay more)
ACH Max 0.80% (no ACH NSF fees)
ID, AML Investor screening for US citizens <= $1.50 per investor
eSignature No fees for adding eSignature to subscription agreements
Wire Transfers Flat fee from a bank; percentage charges are a red flag

Pay attention to the above in blue. In many cases, this is where some providers will take from 4-10% or even more of your capital raise amount.

After completing a Reg A+ offering

For a successful offering, companies should also keep in mind that they need to properly manage all their regulatory obligations once the offering is completed.
KoreConX makes it simple for companies to keep track of all aspects of their fundraising with its all-in-one platform.

The platform enables companies to easily manage their capitalization table, selling securities, and awarding equity to shareholders. Integration with a transfer agent facilitates the issuance of electronic certificates.

Even after the round, the platform provides both issuers and investors with support and offers a secondary market for securities purchased from private companies.

Final thoughts

Knowing your audience, establishing a marketing budget, creating simple terms, and having an accurate valuation will give your Regulation A+ offering the power to succeed and can help you raise the desired funding for your company.

Through the JOBS Act, the SEC gave private companies the incredible power to raise funds from both everyday people and accredited investors, but proper strategies can ensure that the offering meets its potential. 

Successful companies are those who are 100% compliant with their offering and have partners who are not only 100% compliant but also protect you and your investors.

 

Raising capital for startups: 3 red flags for not being tricked

Can a startup pay a transaction-based fee for capital raising assistance? This is a very common question. For the most part, the answer is a clear “no,” but why is that? 

The short answer is that—except under certain limited circumstances—it is illegal. Regulatory protections provide investors with the right to their money back with interest and attorney fees, and it may result in, among other things, the founders not only being held personally liable to investors but also getting listed on a  bad-actor list. 

Finding investors is one of the biggest challenges that  companies face. This is especially true for startups because most founders don’t have an established network of investors ready to invest capital. 

Often, founders who are seeking to expand their network of investors will run into someone who would be happy to make a few introductions … for a fee. RUN AWAY!!

Here are 3 Red Flags while raising capital for your company.

Red Flag #1: Transaction-based compensation

Most often, someone who wants a fee for helping to raise capital (often referred to as a “finder”) is not licensed to do so, and generally speaking, use of a finder who is not a licensed broker-dealer is a violation of federal and state securities laws. Below we summarize how to identify a broker-dealer and then look at the potential negative consequences of using an unlicensed broker-dealer.

What is an unlicensed broker-dealer?

The answer is simple: Just ask the finder, “Are you a registered FINRA Broker-Dealer?” The answer is either yes or no.

For decades, the SEC & FINRA have defined a four-factor test to determine when a “finder” is required to register as a broker-dealer. The SEC’s position is that these 4 factors will be analyzed in determining when someone is acting as a broker-dealer, with no one factor being dispositive:

  1. Whether the person receives commissions or other transaction-based compensation;
  2. Whether the person makes buy/sell recommendations and provides investment details;
  3. Whether the person has a history of selling securities (regular activity); and
  4. Whether the person takes an active role in negotiations between the investor and the issuer.

“What if a finder receives a percentage of the money raised through finder introductions, but does not make recommendations, does not have a history of selling securities, and does not take an active role in negotiations between the investor and the issuer?” 

Despite its emphasis on four factors, the SEC has stated in several no-action letters that transaction-based compensation represents a hallmark of being a broker-dealer, even when the other three factors are absent. Consequently, an individual or company that receives a commission substantially increases the risk that the party receiving the commission will be considered a broker-dealer. For decades, the best advice has been that in view of the risks involved, issuers should typically not engage finders on a percentage-based compensation basis.

Red Flag #2: Reliance on No-Action Letters

On several occasions, we have come across finders who refer to a no-action letter issued by the SEC in 2014 as evidence they can receive a commission despite not being a licensed broker-dealer.

The problem with that position is that the letter has several conditions, including that the buyer of the securities being sold has, following the sale of the securities, (i) control of the company, and (ii) must actively operate the company.

Nearly all startup financings do not fit into this scenario, so the no-action letter does not apply.2

Finders will also often attempt to find (and share with the startup’s leaders) comfort by relying on the 1991 SEC No-Action Letter involving the singer Paul Anka. While often cited by finders, the SEC staff’s decision to not recommend enforcement against Mr. Anka—if, without registering as a broker-dealer, he provided the company a list of potential investors in exchange for a commission—is of limited relevance and utility.

The SEC staff noted its no-action decision was conditioned on several factors, including that Mr. Anka was not engaging in the following activities: soliciting the prospective investors, participating in any general solicitation, assisting in the preparation of sales materials, performing independent analysis, engaging in “due diligence,” assisting or providing financing, providing valuation or investment advice, and handling any funds or securities.

Red Flag #3: Liability for using an unlicensed broker-dealer in capital raise

What Possible Liability Is There for Using an Unlicensed Broker-Dealer to Raise Capital? 

Using a finder will create liability under federal and state law. Agreements for the sale of securities made in violation of federal securities law may be held void.4 This would certainly apply to the agreement with the unregistered broker who attempts to collect a fee for assisting in the sale of the securities.

While the startup may feel that this is not such a bad thing, a violation of federal securities laws also will void (or make voidable) the agreement between the startup and investors under which the startup raised the funds. If the agreements are held void by a court, then all parties to those agreements would have a right of rescission that would last for the later of three years from the transaction or one year from the date the violation is discovered.

A right of rescission is simply a right to cancel the agreement and return each party to its original position, which means returning investments back to investors. In other words, the use of a finder who is not but should be a registered broker-dealer in effect gives the investors a multi-year redemption right.

Are There Other Potential Consequences of Engaging an Unlicensed Broker-Dealer to Raise Capital?
Yes, otherwise we would not have posed the question. Founders who engage unregistered broker-dealers to raise capital may:

  1. SEC Enforcement Actions: Face enforcement actions from the SEC as an aider and abettor8;
  2. State Regulatory Actions: Face enforcement actions from state securities regulators; and
  3. Prohibition and Labeling: Be labeled a “bad actor” and prohibited from participating in or being involved with companies that do securities offerings made under commonly used securities exemptions.9

Additionally, the startup and its principles may be prohibited from using the updated JOBS Act regulations such as Rule 506, Regulation CF, and Regulation A+ securities offering, which is the most commonly relied-upon securities exemption for startups and emerging growth companies. And, just because the list goes on, the use of an unlicensed broker-dealer could impact the ability to close future rounds of financing because of the contingent liability associated with the initial violation, which is likely to come up in investor due diligence.

RegD SEC Reporting Obligations

RegD SEC reporting obligations is a theme that causes a lot of doubts, even concerns, among people who are thinking about raising capital. The compliance details required by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have a lot of particularities, which demands attention of all potential issuers.

Regulation D (Reg D) offerings are exempt from the full SEC registration requirements but still require compliance with certain reporting obligations. The reporting requirements under Regulation D vary depending on the specific exemption used for the offering.

 

RegD SEC Reporting Obligations

In this short guide, we will explain practical details regarding SEC reporting for RegD.

Here’s an overview:

 

Rule 504 Offering (Regulation D, Rule 504):
Companies conducting offerings under Rule 504 are generally exempt from SEC registration requirements. However, there are no specific ongoing reporting requirements mandated by the SEC for Rule 504 offerings.

Rule 505 Offering (Regulation D, Rule 505):
Companies utilizing Rule 505 for their Reg D offerings are allowed to raise up to $5 million within a 12-month period.

While Rule 505 itself doesn’t impose ongoing reporting obligations to the SEC, individual states might have their reporting requirements for Rule 505 offerings.

Rule 506(b) Offering (Regulation D, Rule 506(b)):
Under Rule 506(b), companies can raise an unlimited amount of capital from an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited but sophisticated investors.

There are no specific ongoing reporting requirements to the SEC for Rule 506(b) offerings. However, if non-accredited investors are involved, some level of disclosure may be required to satisfy anti-fraud provisions.

Rule 506(c) Offering (Regulation D, Rule 506(c)):
Rule 506(c) allows companies to conduct offerings where they can generally solicit and advertise their offerings to the public but are limited to accepting investments only from accredited investors.

There are no specific ongoing reporting requirements to the SEC for Rule 506(c) offerings.

However, companies might need to file a Form D notice with the SEC within 15 days of the first sale of securities.

Take note!

While Regulation D exemptions typically do not impose explicit ongoing reporting requirements to the SEC, companies that conduct Reg D offerings are subject to anti-fraud provisions and should provide investors with all material information necessary to make an informed investment decision.

Additionally, states may have their reporting requirements for offerings made under Regulation D, so companies should consider state-specific regulations when conducting these offerings.

It’s important for companies utilizing Regulation D exemptions to consult legal and financial professionals to understand the specific reporting obligations, if any, and to ensure compliance with all relevant securities laws and regulations.

Reg A+ SEC Reporting Obligations (part 2)

Introduction

Welcome back to our RegA+ reporting journey! In the first part we decoded SEC reporting obligations, highlighting Tier 1 and Tier 2 offerings. We also broach crucial forms and compliance essentials. If you didn’t read, click here and learn all about the beginning of this special content that envelops Reg A+ compliance.

What to expect in part 2 regarding SEC forms for Reg A+?

In this article, we’ll delve into specific SEC forms vital for Regulation A+ compliance.

From Form 1-POS to Form 1-U, we’re decoding each form’s purpose, filing process, and significance in your RegA+ journey.

We will also discuss the yearly audit of Form 1-K, the semi-annual reports of Form 1-SA, and Investigate the role of Form 1-U.

 

SEC forms for Reg A+: Form 1-POS

When the subject is SEC forms for Reg A+, it’s essential to understand some of the key forms involved in the process, let’s begin with SEC Form 1-POS.

Also known as Form 1-POS AM, is a filing used by companies that are registering securities under Regulation A of the Securities Act of 1933. It is a part of the registration process for securities offerings conducted under Regulation A, which provides an exemption from the full registration requirements of the Securities Act.

Form 1-POS is a “post-qualification amendment” to an offering statement filed on SEC Form 1-A. It is submitted after the initial filing of Form 1-A but before the offering is finalized. This form contains information updates or amendments to the previously filed offering statement (Form 1-A) that reflect changes or additional details related to the securities offering.

Key aspects of Form 1-POS include:

Aspect Description
Amendments and Updates The form includes updates, corrections, or revisions to the information in the initial Form 1-A filing. It covers changes in offering terms, financial information, business operations, risk factors, or other material information.
Filing Process Companies file Form 1-POS through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. The form is subject to SEC review and comments, similar to the original Form 1-A filing.
Timing Form 1-POS is filed after the initial Form 1-A but before the SEC qualifies the offering statement. It allows issuers to provide updated or corrected information to potential investors and the SEC during the review process.
Purpose The primary purpose of Form 1-POS is to keep the offering statement current and accurate by disclosing any changes or additional material information that has arisen since the initial filing of Form 1-A.
 

Unlocking Reg A+ : Form 1-POS

Form 1-POS is part of the regulatory process involved in offering and selling securities under Regulation A. Companies intending to conduct offerings under Regulation A should work closely with legal and financial professionals to ensure compliance with SEC regulations and to provide accurate and up-to-date disclosures to potential investors and regulatory authorities.

 

Form 1-K – Annual Audit

Annual audit on Form 1-K requires disclosure and discussion of information regarding business operations, related party transactions,  compensation data, beneficial ownership of voting securities, identification of directors, executive officers, and significant employees, management discussion and analysis (MD&A), and the audited financial statements for the year ended (at the US GAAP level). The  Annual Audits must include updated information about Regulation A+ offerings conducted in the year covered.

Being a part of SEC forms for REG A+, Form 1-K must be filed within 120 days after the issuer’s fiscal year-end

Semi-Annual Reports on Form 1-SA (for companies that are not listed on the NASDAQ or NYSE) require disclosure and discussion of financial statements covering the applicable six-month period, including MD&A using the US-GAAP format. No audit is required on the financial statements included in a Form 1-SA.

The  Form 1-SA must be filed within 90 days after the end of the first six months of the issuer’s fiscal year-end.

Reg A+ compliance: Form 1-U – Current Report

SEC Form 1-U, also known as the Exit Report Under Regulation A, is a filing submitted by issuers to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to report certain events and information upon the conclusion or termination of a Regulation A offering.

Key points about SEC Form 1-U include:

    • Reporting Certain Events: Form 1-U is used to report specific events or material changes that occur after the qualification of the offering circular under Regulation A but before the termination or completion of the offering.
    • Information Included: The form typically includes details about the occurrence of events such as a fundamental change in the nature of the business, a change in control of the issuer, bankruptcy, the departure of directors or executive officers, or any other significant events that could affect the company.
    • Filing Process: Companies file Form 1-U electronically through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. The Form 1-U must be filed within 4 business days after the event. 
    • Purpose: The primary purpose of Form 1-U is to promptly notify the SEC and the public about significant events or material changes that could impact the issuer or the offering.

Form 1-U is an essential filing that issuers must submit to the SEC to fulfill their reporting requirements under Regulation A. Companies engaging in Regulation A offerings should work with legal and financial professionals to ensure compliance with SEC regulations and to promptly report any material events or changes that occur during the offering process.

Reg A+ reporting: Form 1-Z – Exit Report

SEC Form 1-Z is a filing used by issuers to report the termination or completion of an offering of securities under Regulation A of the Securities Act of 1933. Regulation A provides an exemption from the full registration requirements for certain securities offerings, allowing smaller companies to offer and sell securities to the public without undergoing the traditional and more extensive registration process.

Form 1-Z, officially titled “Exit Report Under Regulation A,” is filed by issuers to notify the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) about the conclusion or termination of a Regulation A offering. This form serves as a final report to the SEC, providing information about the completion of the offering.

Key points about SEC Form 1-Z include:

Termination Report Form 1-Z is used to report the conclusion or termination of a Regulation A offering, indicating that the offering is no longer ongoing.
Filing Requirement Issuers who have conducted a Regulation A offering that has concluded must file Form 1-Z with the SEC within 30 days after the termination or completion of the offering.
Information Included The form typically includes basic details about the offering, such as the issuer’s information, details about the securities offered, the offering amount, the offering start and end dates, and other relevant information related to the completion or termination of the offering.
Filing Process Companies file Form 1-Z electronically through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system.
Purpose The primary purpose of Form 1-Z is to inform the SEC and the public that the Regulation A offering has concluded or been terminated. It helps maintain transparency and compliance with reporting obligations under Regulation A.

Best practices for Reg A+ : Form 1-Z

Form 1-Z is an essential filing that issuers must submit to the SEC to fulfill their reporting requirements upon the conclusion or termination of a Regulation A offering. Companies engaging in Regulation A offerings should work with legal and financial professionals to ensure compliance with SEC regulations and to fulfill their reporting obligations accurately and in a timely manner.

At least, for best practices for Reg A+ reporting, it’s important to understand all the details and requirements when using the JOBS Act regulations such as RegA+ to make sure you on always compliant.