Blog Old

How AI Can Streamline a Capital Raising Strategy?

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various aspects of business by automating tasks that traditionally require human intelligence, such as speech recognition, decision-making, problem-solving, and processing large datasets. This technological advancement is a game changer in many sectors, particularly in enhancing your capital raising strategy. AI is not just a trend; it’s a strategic tool that can significantly boost your efforts in securing funding.

Incorporating AI into your capital raising strategy allows you to leverage powerful algorithms for data analysis and prediction. By analyzing extensive data sets, AI helps identify patterns, trends, and crucial insights. 

This capability enables you to gain a precise understanding of market conditions and potential investment opportunities. Ensuring access to comprehensive data—such as website visitor analytics, where users disengage during the investment process, behavioral statistics of active investors in general, and insights on those who already invested in your company—is vital. 

Such detailed knowledge optimizes your potential to successfully close your offerings, making it a cornerstone of startups using AI to raise capital.

We know that capital raise will never be the same, to this point and beyond. Let’s take a closer look at how AI is supercharging new capital raising strategies.

4 ways that AI can improve a capital raise strategy

  1. Improving Investor Relations: Leveraging advanced AI tools such as chatbots and virtual assistants can transform how you engage with potential investors. These technologies provide personalized attention, promptly answer inquiries, and guide prospects through the investment process. Enhanced interaction improves investor relations, fosters trust, and increases the likelihood of successful fundraising. Compliance with regulatory standards through coordination with your Broker-Dealer is crucial to ensure all interactions are up to standard. 
  2. Leveraging AI for Market Insight and Trends: Utilizing AI to monitor and analyze real-time data from social media, news outlets, and online forums is a strategic advantage in capital raising. This approach helps you grasp market trends, understand investor sentiments, and monitor competitive movements. With this knowledge, you can adapt and refine your capital raising strategies to stay ahead in the competitive landscape.
  3. Refining Due Diligence Processes: AI enhances due diligence by thoroughly analyzing large datasets, including financial documents and investors’ social media behaviors. It helps identify potential risks and assesses the credibility of potential investors more effectively, ensuring a more secure investment environment.
  4. Facilitating Strategic Decision-Making: Employing AI for decision support involves analyzing intricate data patterns to generate actionable insights. This capability reduces decision-making uncertainty and empowers you with the knowledge to make more informed, strategic choices in your capital raising efforts, ultimately increasing the success rate of your fundraising activities.

Final insights

AI is revolutionizing the way companies raise capital, and it’s no secret. Advanced analytics, optimized workflows, and personalized investor interactions are just a few of the crucial capabilities AI enhances. This technology empowers companies to make more informed decisions and build stronger investor relationships.

Integrating AI into a capital raising strategy can not only streamline operations but also significantly increase the ability to achieve fundraising goals with precision and efficiency. Embracing these innovations is a good starting point to stay ahead of the curve, but all of this falls apart if one of the most essential ingredients, trust, is lacking.

But that’s a topic for another article. Just remember to check the reputation and track record of any platform you use in the capital raising process. Companies such as KoreConX  have a serious commitment to trust, bringing innovative solutions with a focus on compliance in all stages of the process.

Talk to KoreExperts and find out how you can benefit from our AI technologies.

 

Business professional smiling while working on a laptop, with graphics of a rocket and text encouraging to book a call with KoreConX and talk about capital raising

 

Strategic Considerations for Reg D Offerings: Optimizing Private Placements

In the landscape of private securities offerings, Regulation D (Reg D) stands out as a critical framework for companies looking to raise capital without the extensive disclosures required for public offerings. Within Reg D, Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) offer distinct pathways, each with unique advantages and compliance requirements. We delve into the strategic considerations necessary for leveraging these exemptions effectively, providing insights into how companies can optimize their private placements while ensuring full compliance with the regulatory environment. We’ll explore anecdotes illustrating successful applications of both rules, discuss their respective compliance demands, and outline the challenges companies might face when it comes to Reg D offerings. 

Rule 506(b) and 506(c) of Regulation D were crafted to facilitate capital formation, allowing companies to raise an unlimited amount of money from accredited investors and, in the case of 506(b), a limited number of sophisticated non-accredited investors. This post aims to educate potential issuers on how to navigate these regulations efficiently, ensuring that they not only comply with the legal requirements but also strategically position their offerings to attract the right investors.

Anecdotal Successes with RegD 506(b) and 506(c)

Rule 506(b) has traditionally been the go-to option for many startups and established businesses. It allows issuers to raise funds without publicly advertising their offerings, relying instead on existing relationships. An example includes a tech startup that successfully raised significant capital by privately soliciting investments from venture capitalists and angel investors with whom the founders had pre-existing relationships, thus maintaining control over who participated in the offering.

Rule 506(c), introduced under the JOBS Act, permits issuers to broadly solicit and advertise their offerings, potentially reaching a larger pool of investors. A noteworthy case involved a real estate investment firm that utilized online platforms and social media to reach accredited investors across the United States, significantly increasing their investment base and capital inflow more quickly than traditional methods would have allowed.

Compliance Requirements for RegD 506(b) and 506(c)

For RegD 506(b) offerings, issuers must not use general solicitation or advertising to market their securities. They are required to have a pre-existing relationship with prospective investors and must take reasonable steps to verify that all participating investors are either accredited or sufficiently sophisticated to understand the investment risks.

RegD 506(c) offerings allow for general solicitation, but issuers must take rigorous steps to verify the accredited status of all investors. This often involves reviewing personal financial information such as tax returns, W-2 forms, and credit reports, which necessitates a higher level of diligence and documentation.

Challenges of Using RegD 506(b) or 506(c)

Companies utilizing Rule 506(b) may find the restriction against general solicitation limiting, potentially slowing down the capital-raising process. On the other hand, those opting for Rule 506(c) face the challenge of implementing robust verification processes to confirm the accredited status of investors, which can add complexity and cost to the fundraising effort.

The Importance of Trusted Regulatory Partners

Navigating either exemption under Reg D requires careful adherence to SEC regulations. Working with trusted partners such as FINRA-registered broker-dealers, experienced securities lawyers, and knowledgeable auditors can provide the necessary framework to ensure compliance and facilitate a successful capital raise.

7 Steps for Effective Implementation of RegD 506(b) and 506(c)

  1. Engage a Specialized Securities Lawyer: Ensure that all aspects of your offering comply with SEC regulations and state securities laws.
  2. Consult with Professional Auditors: Regular financial audits can establish credibility and transparency, appealing to cautious investors.
  3. Collaborate with a FINRA Broker-Dealer: Partner with a broker-dealer that understands the nuances of RegD 506(b) and 506(c) and is registered to operate across all 50 states.
  4. Select a Capable Technology Partner: Use a platform that supports the specific needs of RegD offerings, including investor management and secure document handling.
  5. Retain an SEC-Registered Transfer Agent: Manage investor records and ensure that transactions comply with federal regulations.
  6. Plan a Strategic Marketing Campaign: Tailor your marketing efforts to align with the regulatory allowances of your chosen exemption.
  7. Use an Investor Acquisition Firm: Develop distinct messaging for different investor bases to effectively communicate the value of your offering.

Navigating the complexities of RegD 506(b) and 506(c) requires a strategic approach and a deep understanding of the regulatory environment. By educating yourself and partnering with experienced professionals, you can optimize your fundraising efforts and engage a diverse investor base efficiently and compliantly. Whether you choose the more private approach of 506(b) or the broader reach of 506(c), the key to success lies in meticulous preparation and strategic execution, working with your advisors to ensure you are fully compliant.

 

 

Regulation D compliance brochure download for capital raising

 

Synergizing Crowdfunding Exemptions: A Strategy for Diverse Investor Engagement

In today’s investment landscape, the ability to harness the full potential of crowdfunding through strategic use of various exemptions provided by the JOBS Act is vital. This legislation introduced transformative avenues such as Regulation D (RegD), Regulation Crowdfunding (RegCF), and Regulation A+ (RegA+), each tailored to different investment and fundraising goals. By understanding and appropriately integrating these regulations, companies can engage a diverse investor base more effectively than ever before. We will explore how synergizing these crowdfunding exemptions can maximize fundraising efforts, discuss the unique compliance challenges involved, and outline key steps to ensure regulatory adherence and optimal engagement.

Each regulation under the JOBS Act brings distinct benefits and caters to specific audiences. RegD is favored for its efficiency in reaching accredited investors, RegCF opens the door to a broader public by allowing investments from non-accredited individuals, and RegA+ bridges these two, allowing for sizable capital raises with public solicitation yet still requiring less disclosure than a full public offering. Navigating these regulations simultaneously requires a strategic approach and an understanding of the compliance landscape, especially when engaging with FINRA Broker-Dealers and other regulated intermediaries.

The Landscape of JOBS Act Regulations

Regulation D (RegD) allows companies to raise funds from accredited investors without the need to register the securities with the SEC, making it a quicker route for companies looking to secure funding efficiently. Anecdotes from tech startups suggest that leveraging RegD can significantly speed up the capital-raising process, as it circumvents many of the lengthy disclosure requirements of traditional securities offerings.

Regulation Crowdfunding (RegCF) democratizes investment in startups by allowing non-accredited investors to participate in early-stage funding rounds. This has been a game-changer for many small businesses and startups that previously struggled to access capital. A memorable story involves a small organic farm that raised enough funds through RegCF to expand its operations nationally, illustrating the power of community support enabled by this regulation.

Regulation A+ (RegA+) is designed to allow companies to raise up to $75 million from the public without undergoing a full SEC registration. It has been utilized effectively by companies ranging from electric vehicle startups to real estate investment trusts, offering both accredited and non-accredited investors the opportunity to invest.

Strategic Use of Multiple Regulations

Using RegD, RegCF, and RegA+ simultaneously allows companies to target different investor segments effectively. For instance, a company might use RegD to secure quick funding from a group of accredited investors while simultaneously launching a RegCF campaign to build community support and enhance brand loyalty among general consumers. Meanwhile, a parallel RegA+ offering could be used to attract serious investors interested in larger, longer-term commitments.

Challenges of Multi-Regulation Strategy

The primary challenge in leveraging multiple crowdfunding regulations concurrently is managing the complex compliance requirements each entails. The administrative burden can be significant, as different disclosures, reporting standards, and investor communications need to be managed distinctly for each regulation.

Importance of Compliance and Professional Guidance

To navigate this complex regulatory environment successfully, it is crucial to collaborate with trusted regulated participants. These professionals ensure that all activities are compliant with the respective requirements of each JOBS Act regulation, providing a robust framework for legal and financial accountability.

Seven Steps for Effective Multi-Regulation Crowdfunding

  1. Seek Professional Legal Advice: Engage a securities lawyer who specializes in JOBS Act regulations to ensure all legal bases are covered.
  2. Consult with Your Auditors: Regular audits are essential to maintain transparency and trust with investors.
  3. Partner with a FINRA Broker-Dealer: Choose a broker-dealer that is licensed in all 50 states and familiar with all three regulations to streamline processes.
  4. Choose the Right Technology Partner: Your technology infrastructure must support the compliance and operational requirements of RegD, RegCF, and RegA+, KoreIssuance provides a full end-to-end for companies wanting to use all three regulations.
  5. Work with an SEC-Registered Transfer Agent: They can manage shareholder records and ensure regulatory compliance across different regulations.  KoreTransfer USA helps companies manage all three regulations to stay fully complaint.
  6. Allocate an Adequate Marketing Budget: Different regulations will require distinct marketing strategies to effectively reach the intended audiences.
  7. Hire an Investor Acquisition Firm: This firm should craft distinct messaging and strategies to optimize engagement across all investor platforms.

Successfully engaging with multiple crowdfunding regulations under the JOBS Act offers tremendous potential to access diverse capital sources. However, it demands a strategic, informed approach and a strong compliance framework. Companies must educate themselves thoroughly and seek appropriate professional assistance to navigate this complex landscape effectively.

By doing so, they can not only maximize their fundraising success but also ensure a stable and compliant investment environment for all parties involved. The synergistic use of RegD, RegCF, and RegA+ can transform a company’s capital-raising capabilities, making it a strategy well worth considering for any ambitious business aiming to make a significant impact in today’s competitive market.

Graphical art representing the RegCF brochure available for download

5 Investment Trends for 2024 by Oscar Jofre

The landscape of private capital markets is evolving more rapidly than ever. Innovative technologies, shifting regulatory frameworks, and changing investor behaviors are reshaping how companies raise capital, how investors allocate resources, and how broker-dealers operate. Here are the top five investment trends predicted by Oscar Jofre, Co-Founder and CEO of KoreConX, that are expected to shape the private capital markets in the upcoming year. This insight will be particularly valuable for investors, companies, and broker-dealers aiming to stay ahead in a dynamic market.

1. Increased Regulatory Oversight and Compliance Automation

Regulatory bodies are ramping up their oversight of private capital markets to ensure transparency, protect investors, and maintain market integrity. In response to this increased scrutiny, we are seeing a surge in compliance automation technologies. Companies and Intermediaries are now integrating advanced compliance software that not only streamlines the process but also significantly reduces human error and associated risks. In 2024, expect to see more sophisticated tools designed to handle complex regulations seamlessly, including those involving blockchain and other emerging technologies. This trend is crucial for broker-dealers and issuers, as non-compliance can result in hefty fines and reputational damage.

2. The Integration of Blockchain Technology in Transaction Management

Blockchain technology is set to revolutionize transaction management in the private capital markets. With its ability to provide transparent, immutable records, blockchain can offer greater efficiency, enhanced security, and improved trust among parties. By 2024, blockchain implementations are expected to be more mainstream in managing transactions, verifying identities, and recording ownership in a way that was not possible before. This technology will allow private companies to streamline their operations and focus more on growth and less on administrative overhead.

3. Growth in ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) Investing

Investor demand for sustainable and responsible investment options is at an all-time high, and this trend will only grow stronger in 2024. ESG factors are becoming critical in investment decisions, influencing everything from asset allocation to risk assessment. Companies that prioritize ESG criteria are not only seeing an uptick in investment from socially conscious investors but are also often outperforming their less sustainable peers. This shift is prompting private companies and broker-dealers to adopt more transparent and accountable business practices.

4. Expansion of AI and Machine Learning

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming investment strategies, operational processes, and customer service in the private capital markets. In 2024, these technologies will play a larger role in predictive analytics, helping companies and investors make more informed decisions by analyzing patterns and trends that would be impossible for humans to identify alone. Additionally, AI is improving the efficiency of due diligence processes and risk management, offering a more sophisticated approach to assessing investment opportunities.  This expansion like blockchain will come under heavy scrutiny from the regulators so it not be abused.

5. Wider Adoption of Cross-Border Investment Platforms

When it comes to investment trends, it is inevitable not to mention technological aspects. As technology continues to break down geographical barriers, cross-border investments are becoming increasingly accessible. In 2024, we can expect to see a significant rise in platforms that facilitate international investment opportunities. These platforms not only expand the investor pool for companies but also provide investors with access to a diversified portfolio beyond their domestic markets. Regulatory technology (RegTech) will be crucial in managing the complexities of international compliance, ensuring that cross-border transactions adhere to varying legal and regulatory standards. This is another investment trend that promises significant innovation in the market in the coming years.

Challenges and Opportunities

These trends, while opening up numerous opportunities, also present unique challenges. The integration of new technologies such as blockchain and AI requires a deep understanding of their potential impacts and regulatory considerations. Companies and broker-dealers must navigate these waters carefully to harness their benefits and avoid pitfalls.

Additionally, the global expansion of investment opportunities demands that market participants stay informed about international regulations which can vary widely from one jurisdiction to another. Ensuring compliance in multiple markets can be daunting but is essential for tapping into global capital pools.

Strategic Moves for Market Participants

For investors, staying educated on emerging technologies and market trends will be crucial. Diversifying investments to include ESG-focused assets could also provide both ethical and financial returns.

Companies seeking to raise capital should consider leveraging advanced technologies to enhance transparency and efficiency in their fundraising efforts. Adopting blockchain for secure, transparent transactions and AI for data management and predictive analytics can provide a competitive edge.

Broker-dealers must focus on integrating robust compliance solutions that can handle the complexities of an evolving regulatory landscape. Staying ahead of the curve in terms of technology adoption will also be vital for delivering superior service to clients and maintaining a strong position in the market.

As we look towards 2024, the private capital markets are set to become more innovative, integrated, and inclusive. By embracing these trends and preparing for their implications, investors, companies, and broker-dealers can not only anticipate changes but actively profit from them. Education, adaptability, and strategic use of technology will be key to navigating the upcoming shifts in the market landscape.

Building a Strong Investor Network: Strategies for CEOs

For CEOs in the rapidly evolving landscape of private capital markets, building a strong investor network is not just a component of their business strategy—it’s a cornerstone of sustainable growth and success. This network serves as a vital support system that can provide not only capital but also strategic advice, industry connections, and credibility.

However, cultivating such a network requires more than just financial acumen; it demands time, patience, and a strategic approach to relationship building. In this blog post, we will explore effective strategies for CEOs looking to develop and maintain a robust investor community, highlight potential challenges, and discuss the role of technology in facilitating these relationships.

Building an investor network is a nuanced process that involves clear communication, shared values, and consistent engagement. Through anecdotes and expert advice, this post will guide CEOs on starting this journey, leveraging technology like KoreConX for investor communications, and navigating the complexities of regulatory environments with tools and partnerships that support compliance and trust building.

Anecdotes of Effective Investor Communication

Consider the story of a tech startup CEO who used monthly webinars and newsletters as a platform to update their investors on company progress, challenges, and market conditions. This open line of communication helped build a trustful relationship, turning initial investors into long-term supporters who were keen to participate in subsequent funding rounds.

Another example is a CEO in the renewable energy sector who organized annual investor retreats, providing a forum for face-to-face interaction and giving investors a hands-on look at project developments. These meetings not only reinforced investor commitment but also sparked discussions on strategic advice and further networking opportunities.

Starting the Journey Towards Building Investor Trust

For CEOs beginning to cultivate their investor network, the journey starts with understanding the importance of transparency and trust. It’s crucial to communicate not only successes but also setbacks. This honesty fosters trust and shows investors that you value their involvement in your company’s journey. Here are a few steps to begin:

  1. Identify Potential Investors: Start by identifying investors who share your company’s vision and values. They are more likely to be supportive over the long term.
  2. Engage Regularly and Meaningfully: Consistent communication through updates, newsletters, or webinars helps keep investors in the loop and makes them feel valued.
  3. Host Investor Meetings: Regular, scheduled meetings can be powerful tools for building rapport and providing deeper insights into your business operations and ambitions.

Challenges in Building an Investor Network

CEOs often face several challenges when building their investor network. A common issue is the balancing act between managing day-to-day business operations and investing time in cultivating relationships. Additionally, the regulatory environment can be complex, requiring careful navigation to ensure that all communications meet compliance standards, especially when discussing future plans and financials.

The Role of Technology in Investor Relations

Technology platforms like KoreConX play a crucial role in managing investor relations by providing tools that facilitate communication across a wide investor base. Such platforms allow CEOs to:

  • Reach a large number of investors efficiently: Automated tools can help send out updates, newsletters, and reports to all investors simultaneously, ensuring consistent communication.
  • Track investor engagement: Analytics tools can monitor which investors are actively engaging with the information, helping CEOs to personalize further communications.
  • Ensure compliance: Keeping track of all communications in one platform helps ensure that all messaging is compliant with regulations like those under the JOBS Act.

Investor network: #7 Strategic Actions for CEOs

When planning to build and maintain an investor network, particularly under the JOBS Act regulations, CEOs should consider the following actions:

  1. Seek Professional Legal Advice: Understand the legal landscape of investor communications and public solicitation, as defined under the JOBS Act.
  2. Engage with Compliance Experts: Work with compliance experts to ensure all investor communications are transparent and within legal bounds.
  3. Choose the Right Technology Platform: Implement a reliable platform like KoreConX that supports effective communication and compliance management.
  4. Develop a Clear Communication Strategy: Plan how and when you will communicate with your network, keeping in mind the importance of regular and meaningful engagement.
  5. Educate Yourself and Your Team: Ensure that you and your team are knowledgeable about the nuances of dealing with investors under different regulations.
  6. Plan for Long-Term Relationship Building: Investor relationships are not just for the duration of a funding round but are long-term partnerships.
  7. Implement Feedback Mechanisms: Allow investors to provide feedback on your communications and business strategy, demonstrating that you value their input and engagement.

Building a strong investor network is a vital strategy for any CEO in the private capital market space. It requires a commitment to transparency, regular communication, and strategic use of technology to manage relationships and ensure compliance.

By educating themselves on the intricacies of investor relations and committing to a long-term engagement strategy, CEOs can cultivate a network that not only supports capital raising but also contributes to the overall strategic direction and success of their business. Remember, building trust in your investor network takes time and consistency. The investment you make in developing these connections strengthens your relationship with the community, opening doors to future opportunities and valuable partnerships.

3 Pitch Deck Secrets for Startups

A well-crafted pitch deck for startups is a cornerstone of successful fundraising, acting as your company’s first impression and primary tool for communicating its value and vision. So we can say that the pitch deck is one of the keys to unlock a startup’s potential. It’s often the first impression you make on investors, and ensuring it resonates is crucial.

This guide unveils the secrets to crafting a flexible pitch deck that adapts to different audiences. You’ll get strategic tips to use in your day by day, regardless of experience. Seasoned entrepreneurs or those just starting their startup journey will gain the knowledge and skills to create a pitch deck that opens doors and propels your startup forward.

The basics: Understanding Your Audience

When it comes to pitch decks for startup, one size does not fit all. Each group has distinct concerns, priorities, and expectations that you must address to captivate their interest and secure their investment.

  1. Venture Capital Firms: VCs are typically looking for scalable business models with high growth potential. They are also interested in your management team’s background and your product or service’s competitive advantage in the market.
  2. Family Offices: These entities manage the wealth of affluent families and may prioritize long-term value and stability. They might be more interested in your company’s vision and values, and how these align with their investment philosophy.
  3. Institutional Investors: Large institutions like pension funds or endowments might seek stable investments with predictable returns. They are particularly keen on risk management strategies and robust financial projections in your pitch deck.
  4. Accredited Investors: Generally more sophisticated than the average individual investor, accredited investors look for detailed and transparent information about the potential risks and rewards.
  5. Non-Accredited Investors (General Public): When regulations allow fundraising from the general public, such as through crowdfunding platforms, the startup pitch deck should be straightforward, avoiding technical jargon, and emphasizing more on the mission and broader appeal of the product or service.

The secret lies in your ability to adapt your deck to suit different types of investors—venture capital firms, family offices, institutional investors, accredited individuals, and even the general public.

Crafting a Flexible Pitch Deck Framework (and tips for pitch deck for startups template)

To address the needs of these diverse audiences effectively, consider creating a modular pitch deck for startups that you can tailor for each presentation without starting from scratch. Here’s how you can build this framework:

  1. Core Slides (Common to All Decks): Company Overview: Briefly introduce your company, what it does, and why it exists. Mission and Vision: Convey your company’s core mission and long-term vision.
Content Section Description
Product or Service – Showcase your offering with clear explanations and, if possible, demonstrations. – Include visuals (screenshots, mockups) to enhance understanding. – If applicable, consider incorporating a short video demonstration.
Market Opportunity – Present market research to back up your claim of a scalable opportunity. – Highlight the size and growth potential of the market you’re addressing. – Emphasize any pain points your solution directly addresses.
Business Model – Explain how you make money. – Be specific about pricing structures, revenue streams, and customer acquisition strategies. – Consider including a simple financial projection to illustrate future growth.
Team – Highlight key team members with bios highlighting their relevant experience and expertise. – Showcase achievements and credentials that demonstrate their ability to execute the vision. – Briefly mention any advisory board members to add further credibility.

Pitch deck for startups template: strategic tips

  1. Customizable Slides (Tailored to Investor Type):
  • Growth Strategy: Vary the emphasis on short-term vs. long-term growth strategies depending on the investor.
  • Financials: Adjust the level of detail and the financial metrics you present based on the sophistication of the investor.
  • Competitive Analysis: For VCs, focus on market disruption. For family offices, emphasize sustainable competitive advantages.
  • Use of Funds: Explain how the investment will be used, tailored to show how it aligns with the investor’s goals.
  1. The Ask: Clearly state what you are asking for (funding amount) and what you are offering in return (equity, debt).

Tips for a Compelling Pitch Deck for startups

  1. Tell a Story: Begin with a problem statement, then show how your product or service provides the solution. Engage your audience with a narrative that makes the need for your business obvious.
  2. Focus on Design: Use professional designs with consistent branding. Avoid cluttered slides; use visuals and charts to make your point wherever possible.
  3. Practice Transparency: Especially with financials, be as transparent as possible. Show both best-case and conservative scenarios for growth projections.
  4. Highlight Your Unique Selling Proposition (USP): Make it clear how your business stands out from the competition.
  5. Include Testimonials or Case Studies: Real-world examples of your product or service in action can build credibility and trust.
  6. Rehearse Your Delivery: No matter how good your pitch deck, the delivery can make or break your presentation. Rehearse in front of unbiased observers who can provide constructive feedback.
  7. Follow Up: After your presentation, send a thank you note and offer to answer any further questions. Include a link to your pitch deck or additional resources that can support your claims.

Final insights

In your capital raising journey, understanding how to tailor your pitch deck to different investor types is crucial. By developing a flexible framework and focusing on the elements that resonate most with each type of investor, you can increase your chances of a successful fundraising effort. Remember, your pitch deck is more than just a presentation; it’s a reflection of your startup’s potential and professionalism. With the right approach, it can open doors and build lasting partnerships with investors who believe in your vision.

Compliance check: why do you need a Bad Actor report?

Companies seeking innovative funding options beyond traditional bank loans or venture capital investments. Regulation A (RegA+), Regulation Crowdfunding (RegCF), and Rule 506c of Regulation D present viable alternatives. 

In this context, while navigating the offering, and compliance with SEC is paramount. One of the most important requirements is the exclusion of “Bad Actors”, a measure to safeguard all the parties involved in the process of raising capital.

Who are Bad Actors?

In the context of securities offerings, “Bad Actors” are individuals or entities with a history of fraudulent activity, particularly involving securities. This can include:

  • Individuals with past convictions for securities fraud.
  • Companies that issued misleading financial statements.
  • Individuals sanctioned by regulatory bodies for financial misconduct.

In other words, those who fall under this disqualification include the company issuing the securities, its officers, directors, significant shareholders, and individuals compensated by the company to solicit or promote the offering.

Also worth mentioning that the criteria for designating someone as a “Bad Actor” encompass eight types of disqualifying events, such as civil and criminal judgments, orders from state and federal administrative bodies, and directives from regulatory authorities. 

How to Avoid Disqualification: “Reasonable Care” and Bad Actor Reports

The SEC offers a “reasonable care” exception to disqualification. This means companies can still raise capital under Regulation A or crowdfunding if they can demonstrate they took reasonable steps to identify and exclude Bad Actors.

There’s no central database for “Bad Actors,” so conducting a thorough “factual inquiry” is crucial. Bad Actor reports from reputable third-party services can significantly help with this process. These reports compile information on individuals and entities, identifying potential disqualifying events based on available data sources.

Examples of Legal Implications of Non-Compliance

The SEC takes violations of Bad Actor disqualification rules seriously. Failing to comply can lead to significant legal and financial repercussions for your company. In severe cases, the SEC might bring criminal charges against those involved.

Understanding these potential consequences highlights the importance of prioritizing compliance practices.

  • Civil and Criminal Penalties: Non-compliance can lead to civil penalties, such as fines or sanctions, and in severe cases, criminal charges. These penalties are designed to deter violations and promote adherence to securities laws.
  • Suspension or Revocation of Securities Registration: If your company is found non-compliant, it could face the suspension or revocation of its registration to issue securities. This would halt any ongoing fundraising activities and could severely impact future capital-raising capabilities.
  • Loss of Exemption Privileges: Companies failing to screen for Bad Actors may lose their exemption status under regulations like Rule 506 of Regulation D, Regulation Crowdfunding, or Regulation A. Losing this status can complicate future efforts to raise capital without the extensive requirements of a full SEC registration.
  • Legal Actions from Investors: Investors may pursue legal action if they suffer losses due to the company’s involvement with Bad Actors. Such lawsuits can be costly and damage the company’s reputation.
  • Reputational Damage: Beyond financial and legal repercussions, the presence of Bad Actors can tarnish a company’s reputation, making it difficult to attract future investors or business partners. Maintaining a clean compliance record is crucial for preserving trust and credibility in the market.
  • Restrictive Orders: The SEC may issue cease-and-desist orders or other restrictive actions, limiting the company’s operations in the securities market. These orders could restrict certain business practices or the issuance of securities.
  • Disclosure Obligations: If disqualifying events occur, companies may be required to make extensive disclosures in their offering materials, which could deter investor interest and affect the overall success of the offering.

The knowledge of these implications helps emphasize the necessity of conducting thorough due diligence and implementing effective compliance measures to protect your company from potential legal challenges and to maintain its good standing in the financial market.

Proactive Measures for Compliance

Avoiding Bad Actor disqualification necessitates a proactive approach:

  1. Thorough Background Checks: Prior to any offering, conduct comprehensive background checks on all involved parties, including officers, directors, and major shareholders. Identifying any past disqualifying events is essential for maintaining eligibility for exemptions.
  2. Utilize Professional Services: Engage reputable firms like CrowdCheck to conduct in-depth investigations and provide detailed reports on covered persons. These reports offer insights into any potential disqualifications, helping companies demonstrate compliance with SEC and FINRA standards.
  3. Exercise Reasonable Care: Implement robust procedures for factual inquiries into the backgrounds of all participants. By demonstrating a commitment to due diligence, companies can establish a defense of “reasonable care” in the event of unforeseen disqualifications.
  4. Ongoing Monitoring: Regularly review and update compliance protocols to adapt to evolving regulatory requirements.  Stay informed about changes in SEC, FINRA regulations, and industry best practices to ensure ongoing adherence to standards.

By adopting proactive measures, companies can mitigate the risk of Bad Actor disqualification and uphold investor confidence in their offerings.

 

Conclusion: Emphasizing Due Diligence in Investments

Innovative funding options like Regulation A (RegA+) and RegCF crowdfunding offer promising opportunities for startups and small businesses to raise capital. However, these avenues come with inherent risks, necessitating careful attention to compliance and investor protection.

A proactive approach to identifying and excluding Bad Actors is essential for companies seeking to raise capital. By conducting thorough due diligence, utilizing third-party services, and maintaining transparency, companies can mitigate risks and instill confidence in investors, ultimately fostering a thriving and trustworthy investment ecosystem.

 

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not intended as financial advice.

Fintechs: Supercharging the Fundraising Landscape

In recent years, the intersection of technology and finance has reshaped numerous industries, with one of the most significant transformations observed in the fundraising ecosystem. Financial technology, or fintech, companies are not merely participating in this arena; they are leading a revolution, supercharging the processes and efficiencies of raising capital. This dynamic shift, driven largely by fintech innovation, has been both a response to and a catalyst for regulatory changes, such as those introduced by the JOBS Act in the United States. Fintech solutions for startups fundraising have become integral to this evolving landscape, exemplifying how technology is transforming access to capital.

The Evolution of Fundraising: From Social Media to Fintech Platforms

The progression from traditional fundraising methods to digital campaigns on social media marked the first significant shift in engaging with potential investors. Social media platforms enabled startups to reach wider audiences, but the technology that truly revolutionized the fundraising landscape is fintech. These innovative platforms have not only expanded reach but have also enhanced the efficiency, compliance, and management of fundraising activities.

Fintech solutions have allowed private companies to manage engagements with thousands—even tens of thousands—of investors online. This capability has proven essential for complying with the complex regulatory frameworks that govern such activities. The integration of technology in these processes is so profound that it’s fair to suggest that without fintech innovation, regulations like those under the JOBS Act would not be as effective or even conceivable.

Streamlining Fundraising with Fintech Solutions

Fintech solutions for startups fundraising have introduced a suite of tools that streamline the fundraising process, making it more accessible and efficient for startups and established companies alike. These platforms address several critical areas:

  1. Pre-Raise Preparation: Before a fundraising round begins, companies must undergo considerable preparation, including regulatory compliance checks, investor documentation, and capital structuring. Fintech platforms like KoreConX offer integrated solutions that help companies prepare thoroughly, ensuring all regulatory requirements are met and the groundwork is laid for a successful raise.
  1. Ongoing Raise Management: Managing a capital raise involves complex logistics, from handling investor queries to ensuring compliance with disclosure requirements. Modern fintech platforms provide tools that automate many of these tasks, reducing the administrative burden on companies and allowing them to focus more on strategic growth efforts.  They can also go further by providing you with who and where you should focus on, KorePixel is such a fintech tool that enhances an offering dramatically.
  1. Post-Raise Investor Relations: After the capital raise, maintaining robust communication with investors is crucial. Fintech solutions facilitate streamlined shareholder communications, regular updates, and transparent reporting practices, thereby nurturing investor trust and engagement.
  1. Compliance and Security: With the increasing digitization of financial services, security, and compliance cannot be overstated. Fintech platforms are designed with stringent security measures and compliance checks embedded into their processes, ensuring that every transaction and interaction meets the highest standards of regulatory compliance.  The emergence of KoreID Verified brings the enhanced Trust investors are looking for when making an investment online.

Case Study: KoreConX All-In-One Platform

A prime example of such a platform is KoreConX. This all-in-one platform supports companies, broker-dealers, and legal teams from the preparation phase through ongoing management and post-raise activities. By centralizing these functions into one platform, KoreConX not only simplifies the management of these complex processes but also significantly reduces the risk of compliance failures. The platform’s capabilities highlight how technology can be leveraged to handle intricate tasks such as investor management, regulatory compliance, and even the allocation and distribution of digital securities.

The Impact of Fintech on Private Companies

For private companies, the advent of fintech has democratized access to capital. Traditionally, these companies might have found it challenging to attract funding without significant resources or connections. Now, technology enables them to showcase their potential to a broader investor base and manage investor relations with the same professionalism as larger corporations.

Fintech has also opened up opportunities for investors by lowering the barriers to entry for investing in private companies. This broader investor base includes not just institutional investors but also individual investors who may be looking to diversify their portfolios.

Embracing Fintech for Future Success

The role of fintech in transforming the fundraising landscape is undeniable. As these technologies continue to evolve, they will further enhance the ability of companies to meet investor expectations and comply with regulatory demands efficiently. For startups and small businesses, embracing fintech solutions is not just a strategic move; it’s a necessary step towards sustainable growth and success.

In the coming years, we can expect fintech to push the boundaries of what is possible in private capital markets even further. Companies that are early adopters of these innovations will likely find themselves at a competitive advantage, equipped to navigate the complexities of fundraising with greater ease and confidence.  Keep an eye out for KoreChain one such company that is going to revolutionize the private capital markets.

In essence, fintech has not just changed the game; it has redefined it, creating a new playing field where efficiency, compliance, and investor engagement are the keys to success. As we look to the future, the synergy between technology and regulatory evolution will undoubtedly continue to shape the landscape, making the mastery of fintech an essential competency for any forward-thinking company in the private capital markets. In this evolving market, fintech solutions for startups fundraising will play a pivotal role, equipping startups with the necessary tools to efficiently navigate the complexities of raising capital while adhering to ever-changing regulations

 

Why Social Media for Startups? 7 Tips to Grab Now!

In today’s hyper-connected world, social media has emerged as a fundamental element in shaping business landscapes. For startups, especially, these platforms offer a direct line to potential customers, partners, and, critically, investors. The evolution of social media has coincided with regulatory advancements such as the JOBS (Jumpstart Our Business Startups) Act in the United States, which has significantly altered the fundraising environment by allowing companies to publicly advertise their fundraising efforts—a veritable game changer.

Here’s why and how startups should leverage social media to catapult their growth and visibility.

1. Increase Visibility with Targeted Content

Startups often face the challenge of building brand recognition from scratch. Social media accelerates this process by providing platforms where targeted content can reach a global audience at the click of a button. Content that resonates with a specific audience can elevate a startup’s visibility exponentially.

 

Social Media Platform Content Format examples Ideas of main objective
Instagram Photos, Short Videos (Reels, Stories) Increase brand awareness, drive engagement, and humanize your brand.
Facebook Blog Posts, Articles, Live Videos Generate leads, establish expertise, and drive traffic to your website.
Twitter Short Videos, GIFs, Text Updates Foster community engagement, build brand awareness, and drive traffic to your website.
LinkedIn Industry Reports, Articles, Long-Form Videos Establish thought leadership, build credibility, and connect with potential investors, partners, and talent.

Tip: Focus on creating high-quality, engaging content that reflects your brand’s values and vision. Use analytics tools provided by platforms like KorePixel, Facebook and Instagram to understand the demographics of your audience and tailor your content accordingly.

2. Engage Directly with Potential Investors

Under the JOBS Act, particularly Titles II, III, and IV startups have the unprecedented ability to openly solicit investments from the public (non-accredited) and accredited investors through social media channels. This can drastically expand the pool of potential investors beyond traditional venture capital networks.

Tip: When engaging with potential investors, maintain transparency and professionalism. Regular updates about your business’s progress, insightful posts about your industry, and thought leadership articles can help establish credibility and attract investment.  Make sure you work with your FINRA Broker-Dealer to make sure your messaging is compliant.

3. Leverage Influencers to Build Credibility

Influencers in various industries can provide startups with a much-needed credibility boost. They can act as brand ambassadors, lending their reputation and following to the startup’s products or services. This is particularly effective in industries like technology, fashion, and health and wellness.

Tip: Identify influencers who align with your startup’s ethos and have a genuine interest in your industry. Collaborations could range from simple endorsements to complex partnerships like co-branded products or guest appearances on webinars.

4. Utilize Cost-Effective Advertising

Advertising on social media is generally more affordable compared to traditional media channels. Moreover, it offers the advantage of being highly customizable in terms of audience, budget, and timing. For startups, this means being able to run lean, efficient campaigns that are data-driven and optimized in real-time.

Tip: Experiment with different advertising formats and platforms to find what works best for your startup. Utilize A/B testing to gauge the effectiveness of your ads and continuously refine your strategy based on performance data.

5. Showcase Your Company Culture

Today’s consumers and investors are increasingly interested in the operations behind the brands they support. Social media gives startups an excellent platform to showcase their culture, values, and the people behind the scenes. This not only helps in building a brand but also in attracting like-minded employees and investors.

Tip: Share behind-the-scenes content, employee stories, and community involvement activities. These posts humanize your brand and can create emotional connections with your audience, which is invaluable for loyalty and engagement.

6. Monitor Feedback and Respond Quickly

Social media channels are a goldmine for customer feedback. Monitoring what people are saying about your brand online can provide you with insights into market needs and product shortcomings, allowing for quick adjustments. Additionally, engaging with followers through comments and messages can build a sense of community and loyalty.

Tip: Set up alerts for mentions of your brand across social media platforms and the web. Use tools like Hootsuite or Sprout Social to keep track of conversations and respond promptly.

7. Drive Traffic to Your Website

Ultimately, the primary goal of most social media activity is to drive traffic back to your company website, where potential investors or customers can take the next step in the engagement process. Social media can effectively funnel users to your site by linking to blog posts, product pages, and other relevant content.

Tip: Ensure that your social media profiles are optimized with a clear bio, link to your website, and a consistent name and image across platforms. Use strong calls-to-action in your posts to encourage clicks to your website.

For startups today, mastering social media is not just an option—it’s a vital part of business strategy. The synergy between regulatory environments like the JOBS Act and the expansive reach of social media offers unprecedented opportunities for startups to secure funding, build brand presence, and engage with a global audience. By embracing these platforms strategically, startups not only enhance their visibility but also forge a path towards sustainable growth and success.

 

A new hope? Crowdfunding vs. Traditional Finance

Introduction

Launching a startup is no walk in the park. It’s like diving headfirst into a wild roller-coaster ride filled with ups, downs, and unexpected twists. It’s a path riddled with obstacles, risks, and often, daunting odds of failure. According to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, a staggering 50% of new businesses fail to survive beyond their fifth year. Yep, it’s tough out there.

But, there’s a shining beacon of hope on the horizon, and it goes by the name of investment crowdfunding or equity crowdfunding or online capital formation. According to CCLEAR in “The Investment Crowdfunding 2024 Trends Report”, startups that get their funding through this method have a better shot at survival, with only about 17.8% of them crashing and burning.

Scroll down to dive deep into the world of equity crowdfunding. We’ll unpack what it’s all about and how it’s giving startups a fighting chance in this crazy entrepreneurial jungle.

Crowdfunding vs. traditional finance: Understanding the Landscape

Traditional Business Financing and Its Challenges

Traditionally, startups have relied on a mix of personal savings, bank loans, and venture capital to get off the ground. Each of these funding sources comes with its own set of challenges. Bank loans often require collateral and a proof of revenue, both of which new businesses might lack. Venture capital, while lucrative, is highly competitive and may demand significant control over the company’s direction.

The Rise of Investment Crowdfunding

On the other side is the investment through crowdfunding, a product of the digital age. This way of getting funds allows entrepreneurs to raise capital directly from the public through online platforms. We can say that crowdfunding democratizes the fundraising process, removing the barriers of traditional financing methods. And more, it allows startups to tap into a broader base of potential investors.

Analyzing the Statistics

General Business Survival Rates

The Bureau of Labor and Statistics’ report that 50% of all new businesses fail within 5 years. This is a sobering reminder of the volatile nature of entrepreneurship. The high rate can be attributed to different elements, including lack of market need, cash flow issues, and fierce competition.

Success in Investment Crowdfunding

However, the recent report by CCLEAR highlights that only 17.8% of companies that got capital through equity crowdfunding have gone out of business. This statistic suggests that equity crowdfunding doesn’t just offer a financial lifeline, but also contributes to a more sustainable business model for startups.

Why Equity Crowdfunding Works

Community and Engagement

One of the key strengths of equity crowdfunding is the community engagement it fosters. Investors are often customers or enthusiasts of the product or service, offering not just capital but also support, feedback, and word-of-mouth promotion. This engaged community can be a significant asset for a new business, driving its initial growth and establishing a loyal customer base.

Flowchart about why equity crowdfunding works
Validation and Market Fit

Raising capital through crowdfunding also serves as a market validation. Successfully funded projects demonstrate a clear demand for the product or service. This allows businesses to adjust and refine their offerings based on real user feedback. It’s like a direct line to the market, which can help startups navigate the initial stages more effectively, reducing the risk of failure.

Flexibility and Control

Unlike traditional financing methods, crowdfunding provides startups with more control over their destiny. By setting their own terms for investment, businesses can maintain control over their direction and culture, which can be crucial for long-term success.

Challenges and Considerations

While investment crowdfunding presents a promising alternative to traditional financing methods, it has some challenges. Along the path, the entrepreneur will come across rigorous regulations to get permission to go live with their offer.  Another point that might be present is the pressure to deliver results to a large group of investors, but it’s not an exclusivity of the crowdfunding method to get money for your business. 

After all the sheer effort to get the documents and correspond to the regulatory obligations, there’s another big challenge. The choice of a reliable crowdfunding platform. This is a decisive point in every offer, because if the platform isn’t compliant or safe, all your efforts can go down the drain. So, since compliance is mandatory, it is essential to make a wise choice when it comes to finding a company to launch your offer. 

Kore powers the most trustworthy crowdfunding platforms in the market. Our secure, All-In-One Platform gives the private market ecosystem the ability to compliantly manage corporate records, captable, funding activities, shareholders, and investors —while efficiently taking advantage of innovative capital-raising opportunities. Kore’s processes and actions are led by one key value: TRUST.  It’s in the DNA of the company.

The contrast between the Bureau of Labor and Statistics’ general business survival rates and the success rate of businesses funded through investment crowdfunding is striking. It sheds light on the evolving landscape of startup financing, where investment crowdfunding emerges as a viable and potentially more sustainable option for entrepreneurs. By leveraging the power of community, market validation, and greater control, startups can significantly increase their chances of survival and success.

As the business world continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how investment crowdfunding develops and what it means for the future of entrepreneurship. The journey is certainly not without its challenges, but for many startups, crowdfunding may just be the key to unlocking their full potential.

 

Bibliograpgy

* CCLEAR. “The Investment Crowdfunding 2024 Trends Report.” cclear.ai, 2024.

12 Years of the JOBS Act: Impact on Startup Funding

12 Years of the JOBS Act

It’s time to reflect on and remember the impact of this innovative legislation in the history of financial market. Passed in 2012, JOBS Act has brought positive changes to the landscape of capital raising and investment in the USA.

This groundbreaking act has opened new doors for entrepreneurs by simplifying the process to go public and secure funding, while also democratizing investment opportunities, allowing a broader spectrum of investors to participate in previously inaccessible ventures.

KoreConX proudly acknowledges the transformative effect the JOBS Act has had on the business and investment community. By reducing regulatory hurdles and fostering an environment conducive to growth and innovation, the Act has played a critical role in supporting startups and small businesses, vital components of the economy’s backbone.

As we celebrate this anniversary, KoreConX remains committed to empowering companies to leverage these opportunities, ensuring a future where businesses can thrive and investors can access a wider range of investment possibilities. Here’s to embracing many more years of innovation, growth, and success under the JOBS Act’s legacy.

12 Years of the JOBS Act, 12 years of revolution in private capital markets.

RegCF Funds: Acquisitions and Strategies

In today’s article, we will explore the differences between Regulation A (Reg A) and Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) regarding their disclosure requirements for companies raising funds.

There’s an interesting contrast between Regulation A and Regulation CF in terms of disclosure.

Reg A requires that issuers provide financial statements for “businesses acquired or to be acquired.” Even if that’s not what the money is being raised for. If you just acquired, or are probably going to acquire, a business (and it doesn’t have to be a whole company, just a “business”, and the SEC Staff has a fairly robust view of when a business is being acquired, so don’t assume you can ever convince them that you are only acquiring “assets”), then you have to provide Reg A-compliant financial statements for that business.

Reg CF doesn’t have that feature. Probably because originally the offering limit for Reg CF was $1 million, and everyone assumed it would be used by very early-stage startups who weren’t going to be in acquisition mode just yet. And what can you buy with $1 million?

But with the offering limit now at $5 million, that has changed. We are seeing later-stage companies using Reg CF, and in several cases we have seen companies that are going to use the funds raised to acquire another company or business. What should they disclose about that acquisition?

Reg CF doesn’t specifically mandate financials statements of the acquiree company in that case. However, if there ARE financials, then it would be consistent with all the other filings in this space (Form C-AR, for example) for regulators or plaintiffs’ lawyers to argue that they should be produced, and that to withhold them would be the omission of material information. While QuickBooks financials are definitely not GAAP, they do include useful information, so consider availability of QB financials in deciding what to disclose. (But also consider how reliable the QB financials are!)

At the very least consider including material data points in the discussion of financial condition in the Form C. What is material is always going to be a facts-and-circumstances analysis, but you should apply that analysis bearing in mind the “catch-all” disclosure requirement of Rule 201(y): “Any material information necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading”. So if your Form C says you are planning to acquire a profitable donut shop, you’d better either explain what you mean by profitable or provide the data necessary to put that statement in context.

Just because disclosure isn’t specifically itemized doesn’t mean it isn’t needed.

It’s always good to remember that seeking professional guidance and leveraging a trustworthy fundraising platform, are 2 essential aspects when raising funds for your company. This combined approach impact both regulatory compliance in your offering documents and a streamlined fundraising process.

Section 12(G) Of The Exchange Act: all you need to know

Understanding the regulations surrounding public offerings is crucial for both companies and investors. In this article written by Patrick Costello, from Bevilacqua PLLC, we’ll delve into Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act. You’ll find insights on outlining the requirements for companies to register securities with the SEC. Also, Patrick sheds light on the factors triggering registration, including asset value and investor thresholds.

Keep reading and learn more about this important matter in the financial market.

Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) (15 U.S.C § 78l(g)) mandates that a company register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a class of securities if:

  1. the company has gross assets of more than $10 million; and
  1. the securities of such class are held of record by more than (a) 2,000 persons or (b) 500 non-accredited investors (as defined under Securities Act Rule 501(a) (17 C.F.R. § 230.501(a))

These are referred to individually as the “Gross Assets Threshold” and the “Held of Record Threshold,” and, together, the “Thresholds.”

Issuers who cross the Thresholds must register the relevant class of securities with the SEC by filing a form 10-12G registration statement within 120 days of the last day of the fiscal year in which the issuer exceeds the Thresholds. After filing its 10-12(G) registration statement, an issuer will need to comply with the continuous reporting obligations under Exchange Act Section 13 as it relates to annual, quarterly, and periodic reports, and beneficial ownership reporting, Section 14 as it relates to proxy rules and Section 16 as it relates to insider transactions in a public company’s securities.

Absent future clarification from the SEC, Section 12(g)’s registration requirements are unavoidable once an issuer crosses the Thresholds under any circumstances. Registration under Section 12(g) is required even if an issuer crosses the Thresholds and subsequently complies with Section 12(g)’s requirements to terminate a registration statement under Section 12(g) (less than 300 holders of record) before the 120-day registration deadline. Further, an issuer who crosses the Thresholds inadvertently and then purposefully seeks to terminate their registration requirements under Section 12(g)(4) may be deemed to be engaging in a scheme to avoid the application of the federal securities laws, likely considered a violation of the anti-fraud rules.

Considering the consequences and difficulties associated with the above aspects of Section 12(g), issuers must engage in proper business planning to avoid an accidental crossing of the Thresholds. Thankfully, there are certain exemptions and definitional exclusions from Section 12(g) that can help issuers avoid crossing Section 12(g)’s Thresholds.

Calculating the Holders of Record

To determine the number of holders of record, an issuer should count (i) each person who is identified as the owner of the record at the company’s registrar for the class of securities and (ii) if the shareholders list was improperly maintained, each person who would have been a record holder had it been properly maintained (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1). As stated above, there are a few exclusions and special rules that apply when calculating the Thresholds. For example, Exchange Act Rule 12g5-1 contains the following special rules:   

 

Corporate Personhood. Securities owned by a corporation, partnership, or trust, or other organization are treated as held by one person (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(a)(2));

 

Securities owned by one or more persons as trustees, executors, guardians, custodians or in other fiduciary capacities with respect to a single trust, estate or account shall be treated as held of record by one person (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(a)(3));

 

Co-owned Securities Co-owners of a security will be counted as one person (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(a)(4));
Similarly Named Holders Securities registered in substantially similar names where the issuer has reason to believe that such names represent the same person, may be treated as held by one person (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(6)).
Crowdfunding Securities; Co-Issuer offerings An issuer that no longer qualifies for Exchange Act Rule 12g-6’s exemption (discussed below) from Section 12(g) for securities issued in a Crowdfunding Offering must count all holders of the same class of securities issued under Regulation Crowdfunding regardless of whether the holders thereof obtained those securities via a Crowdfunding Offering (Regulation Crowdfunding Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, Questions 202.01 and 03).

 

Crowdfunding issuers and Crowdfunding Vehicles, referred to as Co-Issuers, who perform a Co-Issuer Crowdfunding Offering according to Rule 201 (17 C.F.R. § 227.201) and Rule 3a-9 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 C.F.R. § 270.3a-9) can exclude securities issued by the Crowdfunding Vehicle to the extent that natural persons hold such securities. Securities held by non-natural persons are not excludable and must be included in the calculation of the holders of record for both Co-Issuers (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(9)).

 

Equity Incentive Plan Securities Securities held by individuals who received them through an employee compensation plan exempt from the Securities Act’s registration requirements are excluded from the Held of Record calculation (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(8)(A)).

 

Additionally, securities acquired in exempt securities offerings, issued by the issuer, its predecessor, or an acquired company in exchange for securities that are already excludable are excluded from the Held of Record calculation.

 

This exclusion applies if the recipients were eligible under Securities Act Rule 701(c) (17 C.F.R. § 230.701), a registration exemption for offers and sales of securities pursuant to certain compensatory benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation when the original securities were issued (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(8)(i)(B)).

 

Non-Exclusive Safe Harbor:

 

  1. an issuer can consider a person to have received securities under an employee compensation plan if the plan and the recipient met specific conditions set out in § 230.701(c); and

 

  1. an issuer can treat securities as having been issued in a transaction exempt from registration requirements if, at the time of issuance, the issuer reasonably believed that the transaction was exempt (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(8)(i) – (ii)).

 

In addition to the above rules for calculating the Held of Record Threshold, two very important exemptions increase or alter the Thresholds for securities issued under Regulation Crowdfunding and Tier 2 of Regulation A. For Regulation Crowdfunding, Exchange Act Rule 12g-6 (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g-6) states that securities issued in a Regulation Crowdfunding offering will not be counted towards the Held of Record Threshold if:

  1. the issuer is current in its ongoing annual reports;
  2. has gross assets of $25 million or less as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year; and
  3. has engaged a transfer agent to serve as the transfer agent for the securities in question.

Additionally, there is a transition period for issuers who exceed $25 million in gross assets according to (b) above. Specifically, Rule 12g-6 states that a crowdfunding issuer can continue to exclude their securities from the holder of record calculation for a period ending on the day before the last day of their fiscal year, which is two years after the issuer’s total assets rose above $25 million; provided, however, that such issuer continues to comply with its ongoing reporting requirements during those two years. An issuer that does not comply with their ongoing reporting obligations must register the relevant class of securities under Section 12(g) within 120 days.

Likewise, for Regulation A,  Exchange Act Rule 12g5-1(a)(7) (17 C.F.R. § 240.12g5-1(a)(7)) states that companies may exclude securities issued in Tier 2 offerings from the Held of Record calculation if they:

  1. are current in their annual, semiannual, and special financial reports as of the most recently completed fiscal year;
  2. has engaged a transfer agent with respect to the class of securities at issue; and
  3. Had (1) a public float of less than $75 million as of the last business day of its most recently completed semiannual period; or (2) if the public float is zero, then less than $50 million as of the most recently completed fiscal year.

As with Rule 12g-6 above, an issuer can continue to exclude such securities from the Held of Record Threshold for a period ending on the day before the last day of their fiscal year two years after they became ineligible for the Rule 12g5-1(a)(7) exemption. An issuer that does not comply with their ongoing reporting obligations must register the relevant class of securities under Section 12(g) within 120 days.

Conclusion

Section 12(g) represents a critical component of the U.S. securities regulatory framework, balancing investor protection with the practical needs of growing businesses. The evolution of its thresholds and conditions reflects a dynamic response to the changing economic landscape, particularly for startups and small businesses, and especially at a time when exempt capital financing is as accessible as it is today. Understanding these regulations is essential for companies seeking to comply with federal securities laws while capitalizing on opportunities for growth and investment. To do so, it is essential that these issuers engage with qualified securities attorneys who can assist them with compliance and navigation of the federal securities laws.

Stay tuned to our blog! We’re always bringing fresh content to keep you always updated.

Myths About How Capital is Raised by Everyone

Let’s talk about how capital is raised, especially about the myths that surround this matter.

For decades, the narrative around raising capital for private companies has been confined to a familiar sequence of chapters: family and friends, government grants, banks, angel groups, accelerators, and venture capital. This traditional pathway has painted a partial picture of the opportunities available to entrepreneurs, leaving many vital chapters unread and unexplored. However, the advent of the JOBS Act and the rise of online capital formation have added crucial new dimensions to this narrative, expanding the playbook for entrepreneurs seeking funding. We will debunk the myths surrounding capital raising, urging entrepreneurs to read beyond the first six chapters and explore the broader spectrum of options now at their disposal.

The Unread Chapters of Capital Raising

Raising capital is a nuanced art, steeped in tradition yet rapidly evolving with technology. Each of the nine chapters of capital raising—ranging from personal networks to sophisticated online platforms—has its own set of rules, expectations, and audience. Yet, at their core, they all share a common process: crafting a compelling pitch, valuing the business, and reaching out to potential investors. Whether through personal meetings, phone calls, or digital platforms, the essence of capital raising remains a quest to gather a crowd of supporters, investors, and advocates for your business.

Rewards Crowdfunding

Platforms like Kickstarter and Indiegogo have shown that product-based businesses can attract funding from customers and enthusiasts who believe in their vision. This model allows entrepreneurs to validate their market fit while securing the capital needed for production and scaling.

JOBS Act Regulations (RegCF, RegD, RegA+)

The JOBS Act has revolutionized access to capital by legalizing equity crowdfunding (RegCF), simplifying offerings to accredited investors (RegD), and expanding the ability to publicly solicit investments (RegA+). These regulations have democratized investment, making it accessible to a broader audience of both entrepreneurs and investors.  There is now over 2,500 platforms in the USA alone that cater to any of the such JOBS Act Regulations but Spark.Market and Red Crow are now becoming the new trend of online capital formation.  

Online Capital Formation

The digital transformation of capital raising has enabled platforms to streamline the investment process, making it more efficient and far-reaching. Online capital formation leverages technology to connect companies with a global pool of investors, transcending geographical and traditional barriers.  KoreIssuance sole purpose is to enable companies to utilize the JOBS Act regulations and to allow companies to raise capital on their own terms, and website.

Technology’s Role in Accessing Capital

The transition to online platforms has not only modernized the capital raising process but also expanded its potential. Digital platforms offer a cost-effective, efficient way to reach investors, turning the erstwhile daunting task of fundraising into a more manageable, even rewarding endeavor. This shift towards online capital formation fosters a more inclusive ecosystem, where businesses can attract not just investors but also future customers, partners, and champions of their brand.  The entire process is done online with such infrastructure created by KoreConX, which provides the infrastructure for all participants (investors, companies, issuers, lawyers, auditors, IA firms, Broker-Dealers, SEC-Transfer Agents, ATS, OMS, Banks, Payment Rails) this is the key to allow democratization.  In this new world, people can invest as low as $5.00 and it can be done cost effective and 100% compliantly.

Challenges Beyond Chapter 6

Venturing into the realms of rewards crowdfunding, JOBS Act regulations, and online capital formation presents its own set of challenges. Entrepreneurs may encounter skepticism from traditionalists who view these methods as less prestigious or viable. However, the success stories emerging from these avenues are dispelling such myths, proving that these “new chapters” are not just viable but also potentially more aligned with the modern entrepreneurial journey.

Keep in mind the skepticism they demonstrate is a reaction to how threatening this way of capital raising is competing with them.  You will hear remarks like, “dumb money”, “they bring no value”, “not sophisticated” and much more.  This tells you when something is working when money (investors) have choices and they are selection you rather than going to a fund.

Embracing the Full Spectrum of Capital Raising

Educate Yourself: Understand the nuances and requirements of each capital-raising avenue.

Build a Comprehensive Pitch: Tailor your pitch to suit different platforms and investor expectations.

Leverage Technology: Use online platforms to streamline the fundraising process and reach a broader audience.  Working with KoreIssuance can be the difference of success and failure.

Engage Your Network: Tap into your personal and professional networks for initial support and validation.

Explore All Avenues: Don’t limit yourself to traditional funding sources; explore crowdfunding, online platforms, and JOBS Act opportunities.

Compliance and Transparency: Ensure your fundraising efforts comply with legal requirements and maintain transparency with potential investors.  Trusted partners is essential to any type of successful capital raise.

Value Beyond Capital: Look for investors and platforms that offer value beyond just funding, such as mentorship, networking, and market access.

Continuous Learning: Stay informed about evolving regulations and emerging platforms to maximize your fundraising potential.

The landscape of capital raising is broader and more diverse than ever before. Entrepreneurs today have the opportunity to explore a multitude of chapters beyond the traditional six, each offering unique benefits and access to a wider range of investors. By embracing the JOBS Act regulations and leveraging online capital formation, startups can navigate the fundraising process more effectively, tapping into a vast pool of potential supporters. Educating oneself about these opportunities, working with trusted advisors, and adopting a strategic approach to capital raising are essential steps toward securing the necessary funding. In the ever-evolving narrative of entrepreneurship, understanding and utilizing the full spectrum of funding options available is not just an advantage—it’s a necessity.

Investor Acquisition in online capital raising

Let’s talk about Investor Acquisition in online capital raising.

There are over 4.7 Billion potential investors online, but finding the right people to invest in your company among that vast number can seem overwhelming. That is why it is important to understand the various Investor Acquisition (IA marketing) activities you can use to achieve your goal.

Online capital formation (OCF), also known as crowdfunding, refers to the process of raising capital for a business, project, or venture by soliciting small investments from a large number of individuals through the Internet. This is typically done through online platforms or direct listings on company websites that connect entrepreneurs and businesses with potential investors.

 

There are several types of Online Capital Formation (OCF), including:

 

  • Equity-based, in which investors receive an ownership stake in the business in exchange for their investment
  • Debt-based, in which investors lend money to the business and are repaid with interest
  • Token-based, similar to equity but the ownership is tracked and managed in a compliant blockchain technology

 

Online capital formation (OCF) allows businesses and entrepreneurs to access capital from a wider pool of potential investors, and it can also provide a way for individuals to invest in businesses and projects that they are passionate about.  Online capital formation can also help businesses to validate their ideas and to test the market before launching a full-scale fundraising campaign. However, it is important to note that crowdfunding may be subject to different regulations and laws in different jurisdictions.

 

Online capital formation refers to the process of raising funds for a business, project, or venture by soliciting investments from a large number of individuals over the Internet, typically through online platforms such as crowdfunding sites, or online investment platforms like angel networks, or private equity platforms.

 

Online capital formation can include various forms of fundraising, such as:

  • Private Placement Memorandums (PPMs)
  • Regulation A+ (RegA+) Offerings
  • Regulation CF  (RegCF)  Offerings
  • Regulation D (RegD) Offerings
  • Regulation S (RegS) Offerings
  • Regulation 45-106 Offerings
  • Regulation OM Offerings
  • Regulation 708 Offerings

 

Online capital formation allows companies to reach a wider pool of potential investors and to raise funds more efficiently and cost-effectively than traditional fundraising methods. It also provides investors with more opportunities to invest in startups and early-stage companies, and to diversify their portfolios. However, it is important to note that online capital raising may be subject to different regulations and laws in different jurisdictions. Additionally, online platforms that facilitate online capital raising need to be registered with regulatory bodies and comply with securities laws. Investors should also be aware of the risks associated with investing in start-ups and early-stage companies, as these investments are considered higher risk than traditional investments.

 

There is much we can learn from other types of marketing, to make sure best practices are applied.  One basic principle we feel has been severely overlooked by the entire online capital formation sector is their tactics involve no relationship, and no community building.

 

We describe this approach like this:  

 

The number of marketing touches it takes to get an online subscriber can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, such as the industry, target audience, and the type of content or offer being promoted. Typically, it may take several touches before a potential subscriber feels comfortable enough to provide their contact information. According to the rule of seven, the average number of marketing “touches” it takes to convert a lead into a sale is 7.  And depending on specific audiences, funnels, and strategies, this number may be different.

Investor acquisition (IA) refers to the process of identifying, reaching out to, and acquiring new investors for a company or an investment fund. The goal of investor acquisition is to raise capital, and to increase the number of shareholders in a company or the number of investors in a fund.  They do this by first starting in building your community of followers.

 

Investor Acquisition in online capital raising can take many forms, such as:

  • Cold-calling or emailing potential investors
  • Networking and building relationships with potential investors
  • Participating in roadshows and investor conferences
  • Using online platforms and social media to reach a wider audience
  • Using investor databases and investor targeting tools to identify and reach out to potential investors
  • Create online community of like-minded individuals who support your vision, product, service to make your brand ambassadors to champion your offering

 

Investor acquisition can be a complex and challenging process, as it requires a deep understanding of the target audience, the industry, and the investment opportunities. Companies or investment firms that are seeking new investors need to have a clear value proposition and a compelling pitch, as well as a strong track record of performance, to be able to convince potential investors to invest. Additionally, they also need to comply with securities regulations and laws when reaching out to potential investors.

 

At KoreConX our goal is to make sure you achieve yours.  We provide an eloquent way for you to access millions of potential followers, clients, affiliates, like-minded individuals who will want to be associated with your company, brand.

 

What is important is how this is achieved and we believe if you follow the principles of 7 you can achieve this goal.

 

The number of marketing touches it takes to get an online subscriber can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, such as the industry, target audience, and the type of content or offer being promoted. Typically, it may take several touches before a potential subscriber feels comfortable enough to provide their contact information. According to the rule of seven, the average number of marketing “touches” it takes to convert a lead into a sale is 7. And depending on specific audience, funnels, and strategies, this number may be different.

 

The strategy is simple.  

The process is challenging.  

The reward is achieving your goal

Stage 1

Build your community & affinity with your company utilizing the 7 touch process.

 

Romance the Journey

  • Bring relevant information
  • Bring relevant value to your audience
  • Educate
  • Gain trust
  • Ask to join the journey

TouchPoints  (1-7)

Each type of TOUCH Point is to build a relationship with the USER in building your community.  As you build your community, you create an affinity with each of the USER which allows you the opportunity to introduce them to your journey.

 

  • Create Landing Pages/Squeeze Pages 
  • Create Pop-ups
  • Create Target Ads
  • Create Investor Persona
  • Webinar
  • Podcast
  • Email Marketing
  • Newsletter
  • Download (book, information)

 

Stage 2

After they invested it’s just as important to be reaching out but it needs to be on an even more personal level.

 

  • Thank them, and welcome them to your family, and company
  • Meet the Team
  • Meet our partners
  • Follow us on Social Media
  • Progress update
  • Family & Friends Program
  • Invitation for special programs
  • Newsletter
  • Engage, keep engaging
  • Engage, Engage, Engage
  • Enage

 

Strategy

  • Do not call them Investors
  • They are:
    • Customers,
    • followers, 
    • clients, 
    • affiliates, 
    • like-minded individuals who will want to be associated with your company, or brand.
    • brand ambassadors
  • Investment Strategy for Your Journey
  • Business Plan
  • Budget
  • Sets the tone for all marketing activities

 

You are now set to engage with IA firms who can assist you with your goal for your company.  This ebook provides A-Z all the buzzwords and provides you the reasons why each of these IA tactics is important for your online capital raise.   You do not need to use all of them, but it’s important to understand each one, first look at what your company has and how you can complement what you need.   At the end of the book we also provide you with a great IA checklist so you can move through the process faster, so you can get started on building your company and your capital raising.

 

“Nothing in this world is easy, but for those who want to succeed, the journey will be easy” 

– Oscar A Jofre

 

Online investing on the Rise: What to look for?

Online investing, particularly in private capital markets, has experienced a significant uptick in popularity and accessibility in recent years, largely thanks to the innovations brought about by the JOBS Act. The Act’s regulations have democratized access to investment opportunities, allowing Americans over 18 years of age to engage in the private sector’s growth potential. We will delve into the online investing landscape, highlighting the ease with which investors can now participate, the challenges they face, and the due diligence required to make informed decisions. With platforms like Spark Exchange emerging to streamline the investment process and initiatives like KoreID Verified enhancing security, the sector is ripe for informed investors ready to explore. Here are the insights and red flags every investor should be aware of in this burgeoning space.

The Rise of Online Investing

Since the spike in 2019, online investing, or online capital formation, has become a major trend, set to increase as investors gain access to comprehensive information online to guide their investment decisions. The JOBS Act has played a pivotal role in this upward trajectory, simplifying the process for companies at any stage to raise capital through regulations like RegCF, RegD, and RegA+. For investors, the journey has never been more straightforward. In less than two minutes, one can invest in a private company, fulfilling all necessary SEC requirements and gaining instant connectivity to the company’s growth story.

The Investor Journey Online

Investing online is characterized by convenience and accessibility. With just a few clicks, investors can provide all required information and complete their investment, benefiting from the SEC’s mandated disclosures by the companies using the JOBS Act regulations (RegCF, RegD, and RegA+). This transparency ensures that investors can do their homework from anywhere, anytime, accessing all the information they need about a private company qualified by the SEC to raise capital online.

Challenges in Online Investing

Despite the streamlined process, challenges remain for those looking to invest in private companies. One primary concern is finding a centralized platform where potential investments are listed, with Spark Exchange being a notable emerging solution. However, the most significant challenge is verifying the legitimacy of companies. As online investing becomes more prevalent, ensuring a company’s authenticity before investing is crucial. Until solutions like KoreID Verified become standard, providing a Certificate of Authenticity for companies, investors must engage in rigorous due diligence to avoid scams and ensure their investments are sound.

Red Flags for Online Investors

Investors should be vigilant for several red flags when considering an online investment in private companies:

Registration of Offering: Verify if the company has registered its offering appropriately, with RegCF offerings showing a Form C and RegA+ offerings a Form 1A, both linked to the SEC website.

Leadership’s LinkedIn Profiles: Review the LinkedIn profiles of the founders and key executives to assess their commitment and background.  If they are not in LinkedIn major red flag, if they do not have the company listed run.

Broker-Dealer Association: Inquire about the name of the Broker-Dealer the company is working with.

Escrow Provider Details: Ask for the name of the escrow provider where funds are to be sent, ensuring financial transactions are secure.

Legal Counsel Verification: Request the name of the legal counsel who prepared the offering documents, adding a layer of legitimacy.

Company Registration Verification: Conduct an online search to confirm the legal registration of the company.

Website Transparency: The company’s website should transparently list the team, legal company name, and other essential details; the absence of this information is a red flag.

Educating Oneself is Key

The importance of educating oneself before making an investment in a private company cannot be overstated. Understanding the nuances of the JOBS Act and the rights it affords you as an investor is critical. Engaging in thorough due diligence, from verifying the offering’s registration to researching the company’s leadership and legal standing, is essential in choosing the right investment. The landscape of online investing in private capital markets is rich with opportunities, but it demands an informed and cautious approach. As the sector continues to evolve, empowered by regulatory advancements and technological innovations, investors equipped with the right knowledge and vigilance stand to benefit significantly from the growth potential of private companies.

 

Regulation S vs Rule144 explained

Introduction: Regulation S vs Rule 144

Regulation S and Rule 144 are pivotal components of the United States securities law framework, each facilitating different aspects of the capital markets, particularly in the context of private offerings and the sale of securities to non-U.S. investors. Understanding the nuances between these two regulations is essential for issuers, investors, and intermediaries navigating the private capital markets.

Regulation S

Regulation S provides a safe harbor that exempts securities offerings from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as long as the offering is conducted outside the United States. Most people are not aware that is particular regulation was named after Sara Hanks when she was at the SEC.  This regulation is designed to facilitate the sale of securities to non-U.S. residents in offshore transactions, without the stringent disclosures and registration processes required for public offerings in the U.S.

Key Features of Regulation S:

  • Offshore Transactions: Regulation S applies only to offers and sales of securities that occur outside the U.S. and to non-U.S. persons. The issuer must ensure that the offering cannot be deemed to have been made to a person in the United States.  The offering must be gated and block all U.S. persons, one other major factor is that a company must follow local securities laws to make sure they are compliant when offering their securities in offshore markets.
  • Category System: Regulation S categorizes offerings to determine the level of restrictions required to prevent the securities from flowing back into the U.S. market. These categories help in defining the resale limitations and distribution compliance period for the securities.
  • No Directed Selling Efforts: Issuers and distributors must not engage in any directed selling efforts within the United States, ensuring the offering is genuinely foreign and not targeting U.S. investors indirectly.

Rule 144

Purpose and Application: Rule 144 provides a safe harbor for the public resale of restricted and controlled securities in the U.S. market, without requiring SEC registration. This rule is crucial for investors looking to sell their holdings of restricted securities (typically acquired through private placements or as compensation) and for affiliates of the issuer who hold control securities.  This very common with RegD 506b and 506c offerings.

Key Features:

  • Holding Period: Sellers must adhere to a specific holding period before restricted securities can be sold on the public market—six months for securities of a reporting company and one year for a non-reporting company.
  • Volume Limitations: There are limits on the volume of securities that can be sold within a three-month period, which helps prevent market manipulation and protect investors.
  • Manner of Sale and Information Requirements: Rule 144 imposes conditions on how sales can be made and requires that adequate current information about the issuer is publicly available.

Differences Between Regulation S and Rule 144

  • Geographical Focus: Regulation S deals exclusively with offers and sales of securities conducted outside the United States to non-U.S. persons. In contrast, Rule 144 applies to the resale of restricted and controlled securities within the U.S. market.
  • Targeted Securities and Sellers: Regulation S can be applied by issuers, distributors, or their affiliates for initial sales to non-U.S. persons. Rule 144 is used by shareholders (both affiliates and non-affiliates) who seek to sell their restricted or controlled securities in the U.S. market.
  • Conditions and Restrictions: While both set forth conditions to prevent the improper flow of securities, Regulation S focuses on ensuring that the securities are offered and sold outside the U.S. without directed selling efforts to U.S. persons. Rule 144 establishes criteria related to holding periods, volume limitations, and disclosure to facilitate the safe resale of securities in the U.S.
  • Purpose: The fundamental purpose of Regulation S is to exempt international securities transactions from U.S. registration requirements, promoting global capital formation. Rule 144, however, aims to provide liquidity for holders of restricted and controlled securities by enabling a pathway to public resale under certain conditions.

Regulation S and Rule 144 address different needs within the securities market, reflecting the SEC’s efforts to accommodate the complexities of global capital flows while protecting investors. Regulation S facilitates the international offering of securities by U.S. and foreign issuers, whereas Rule 144 allows investors to sell restricted and controlled securities in the U.S. Understanding these regulations is crucial for conducting compliant securities transactions, whether operating within the U.S. or on a global scale.

It’s always important when using either of these regulations to speak to your securities lawyer to ensure your company is using the regulations compliantly.

Why is building a community important when raising capital?

The private capital markets are very dynamic, and the advent of online investing, also known as online capital formation, marks a pivotal shift in how companies approach capital raising. This shift necessitates a focus not just on attracting investors but on building a community around the business. The JOBS Act regulations have played a significant role in this transformation, enabling companies to tap into a vast pool of 233 million Americans. We will review what is the critical importance of cultivating a community of like-minded individuals and companies who share a passion for your business. As we navigate the nuances of utilizing the JOBS Act Regulations (RegCF, RegD, and RegA+), it becomes evident that building a community is not just a strategy but a necessity for accessing capital and creating a sustainable growth trajectory.

The Impact of Community in Capital Raising

The power of community in the context of raising capital cannot be overstated. A well-engaged community can serve as a formidable force in spreading the word, creating a viral effect that traditional marketing efforts might not achieve. When a company introduces a new product line or announces a significant hire, having a community means there’s an already engaged audience ready to amplify the message. More importantly, this community becomes a credible voice to potential investors. Testimonials from community members who have invested can resonate more authentically than any marketing pitch, providing firsthand accounts of why they chose to support the business.

Challenges in Building a Community

Cultivating a community is no small feat and presents several challenges. Leadership from the CEO down is crucial; this initiative cannot be viewed as an outsourced function but rather as an integral part of the company’s DNA. Commitment to community-building must be unwavering, not just for the duration of a capital raise but as a perpetual aspect of the company’s operation. This approach requires time, resources, and a genuine desire to engage and grow with your community.

Steps to Building Your Community

Define Your Core Values: Start by articulating the core values and mission of your company. These will be the rallying points around which your community gathers.

Engage Through Social Media: Utilize social media platforms to share your story, updates, and milestones. Be consistent and authentic in your engagement.

Create Value-Driven Content: Produce content that educates, entertains, or informs your audience, fostering a sense of belonging and shared purpose.

Leverage Email Marketing: Keep your community informed and engaged with regular updates, insights, and opportunities to participate in your journey.

Host Community Events: Whether virtual or in-person, events can be powerful tools for strengthening community ties and encouraging direct interaction.

Encourage Feedback: Open channels for your community to share their thoughts, feedback, and suggestions. This two-way communication is vital for community health and growth.

Show Appreciation: Acknowledge and reward your community’s contributions and support. Recognition can go a long way in fostering loyalty and advocacy.

Building a community in the context of raising capital under the JOBS Act regulations is a strategic imperative that transcends mere financial transactions. It’s about creating a sustainable ecosystem where shared passion and collective support fuel business growth. As companies navigate this journey, understanding the nuances of community engagement, the commitment required, and the strategies for success is paramount. Whether your company operates in the B2C, B2B, or B2B2C space, the principles of community building apply universally. In embracing this approach, companies not only secure the capital they need but also cultivate a loyal base of advocates who will be instrumental in their long-term success. Remember, the strength of your community reflects the strength of your business; invest in them, and they will invest in you.

Accredited investor definition and SEC Review

In this special article written by Laura Anthony from Securities Law Blog, we’ll learn more about recent matters regarding accredited investor definition and SEC Review.

Keep reading and discover more about this fundamental topic in the financial markets, especially when you’re looking to raise capital.

On December 15, 2023, the SEC issued a staff report on the accredited investor definition.  The report comes three years after the most recent amendments to the accredited investor definition (see HERE).

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) requires the SEC to review the accredited investor definition, as relates to natural persons, at least once every four years to determine whether the definition should be modified or adjusted.  The last two reports can be read HERE and HERE.

The current report focuses on the composition of the accredited investor demographic, including since the last definition amendments; the extent to which accredited investors have the financial sophistication, ability to sustain the risk of loss of investment, and access to information that have traditionally been associated with an ability to fend for themselves; and accredited investor participation in exempt offerings.

I’ve included the complete current accredited investor definition at the end of this post.

Background

All offers and sales of securities must either be registered with the SEC under the Securities Act or be subject to an available exemption from registration. The ultimate purpose of registration is to provide investors and potential investors with full and fair disclosure to make an informed investment decision. The SEC does not pass on the merits of a particular deal or business model, only its disclosure. In setting up the registration and exemption requirements, Congress and the SEC recognize that not all investors need public registration protection and not all situations have a practical need for registration.

However, exempted offerings carry additional risks in that the level of required investor disclosure is much less than in a registered offering, the SEC does not review the offering documents, and there is no federal ongoing disclosure or reporting requirements.  The premise of allowing offering exemptions to accredited investors is that such investors are able to fend for themselves and, accordingly, do not need the protections afforded by the registration requirements under the Securities Act because they have access to the kind of information which registration would disclose (SEC v. Ralston Purina Co.).

Diving deeper: Definition of an accredited investor

The definition of an accredited investor has become a central component of exempt offerings, including Rules 506(b) and 506(c) of Regulation D.  Qualifying as an accredited investor allows an investor to participate in exempt offerings including offerings by private and public companies, certain hedge funds, private equity funds and venture capital funds.  Further accredited investors are not bound by the investor limitations set forth in Regulation Crowdfunding or Regulation A, and investors in a Regulation Crowdfunding offering are free to sell to accredited investors without complying with the one-year prohibition on resales.

The concept of “accredited investor” is not limited to exempt offerings but permeates the state and federal securities laws in general.  For instance, a company is required to register under Section 12(g) if as of the last day of its fiscal year the number of its record security holders is either 2,000 or greater worldwide, or 500 persons who are not accredited investors or greater worldwide.  Accordingly, companies must differentiate between record holders who are accredited investors and nonaccredited investors.  For more on Section 12(g) registration see HERE.

Most state securities statutes contain a definition of an accredited investor that either tracks the federal definition, or in some cases, contains higher thresholds for institutional investors ($10 million as opposed to $5 million).  Some states use the accredited investor definition to determine whether investment advisers to certain private funds are required to be registered. FINRA also uses the definition to determine the private placement document filing requirements for placement agents.

Accredited Investor Pool

The SEC has no real source of information on the number of natural persons that are accredited investors but rather must rely on assumptions and general information provided by, for example, the Federal Reserve Board’s Survey of Consumer Finances.  However, the SEC estimates that approximately 18.5% of U.S. households qualify as accredited investors based on income standards.   The SEC estimates that the number of accredited investors has grown steadily, attributing some of this growth to the fact that the definition has never been adjusted for inflation.  According to the SEC report, if the natural person accredited investor thresholds were adjusted to reflect inflation since their initial adoption through 2022 using CPI-U, the net worth threshold would increase from $1 million to $3,037,840, the individual income threshold would increase from $200,000 to $607,568, and the joint income threshold would increase from $300,000 to $911,352, which is s significant jump from the current definition.

The SEC also points out that its estimate does not include the indeterminate additional number of people that would qualify as accredited based on holding qualified professional licenses or being knowledgeable employees at private funds.  Same for the number of individuals that may qualify as a director, executive officer, or general partner of the issuer.

The SEC report delves into the composition of assets for most U.S. households concluding that a disproportionate amount of assets are held in retirements savings accounts and plans that are directed or controlled by individuals, who “may lack experience in building a portfolio that appropriately allocates risk and ongoing management of investments, including preparing for the illiquid nature of private company investments.”  Although the SEC admits there is limited information available to assess the financial sophistication of accredited investors, it still leans towards concluding, they are not sophisticated or protected.

The SEC points to this as a reason to question the continued utility of the current financial thresholds. I flat-out disagree.  Without side-by-side evidence of retirement losses, investors suffering from poor decision-making, investors suing for private investment losses, regulatory actions related to inappropriate private offerings involving retirement accounts, or any other reasonable metrics supporting the alleged inability of U.S. households to make their own investment decisions with their own money, I find this discussion lacking in evidentiary support.

Accredited Investor Participation in the Exempt Offering Market

The SEC has no proper methodology to estimate the participation of natural person accredited investors in the exempt offering market.  However, they do estimate that approximately $3.7 trillion of new capital was raised in exempt offerings in 2022.  Although clearly the vast majority of the investors are accredited, the breakdown between natural persons and institutions or entities is unknown.  The SEC spends several pages espousing statistics based on Form D filings but, as they indicate, many issuers do not file a Form D and even when they do, it may be at the beginning of an offering and contain no information about the offering results or investor composition.

Conclusion

Although the SEC report’s introduction explains that it will examine accredited investor demographics and investment habits, in actuality the SEC has no reliable or aggregated sources of information from which to obtain these facts.  Although I summarize some of the findings, the conclusion is that all information is a best guess and estimate.  With such a lack of information, the SEC chooses to err on the conservative side seemingly leaning towards suggesting raising the financial thresholds.  Laura has a different perspective, disagreeing with this approach.

In general, she considers that the report offered little useful information.

Current Definition of Accredited Investor

Accredited investor shall mean any person who comes within any of the following categories, or who the issuer reasonably believes comes within any of the following categories, at the time of the sale of the securities to that person:

(i) Any bank as defined in section 3(a)(2) of the Act, or any savings and loan association or other institution as defined in section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Act whether acting in its individual or fiduciary capacity; any broker or dealer registered pursuant to section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; any investment adviser registered pursuant to section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or registered pursuant to the laws of a state; any investment adviser relying on the exemption from registering with the Commission under section 203(l) or (m) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; any insurance company as defined in section 2(a)(13) of the Act; any investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 or a business development company as defined in section 2(a)(48) of that act; any Small Business Investment Company licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration under section 301(c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958; any Rural Business Investment Company as defined in section 384A of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act; any plan established and maintained by a state, its political subdivisions, or any agency or instrumentality of a state or its political subdivisions, for the benefit of its employees, if such plan has total assets in excess of $5,000,000; any employee benefit plan within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 if the investment decision is made by a plan fiduciary, as defined in section 3(21) of such act, which is either a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or registered investment adviser, or if the employee benefit plan has total assets in excess of $5,000,000 or, if a self-directed plan, with investment decisions made solely by persons that are accredited investors;

(2) Any private business development company as defined in section 202(a)(22) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940;

(3) Any organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, corporation, Massachusetts or similar business trust, partnership, or limited liability company, not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, with total assets in excess of $5,000,000;

(4) Any director, executive officer, or general partner of the issuer of the securities being offered or sold, or any director, executive officer, or general partner of a general partner of that issuer;

(5) Any natural person whose individual net worth, or joint net worth with that person’s spouse or spousal equivalent, exceeds $1,000,000 excluding such person’s primary residence (both on the asset and liability side except that indebtedness in excess of the fair market value of the primary residence shall be included as a liability);

(6) Any natural person who had an individual income in excess of $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with that person’s spouse or spousal equivalent in excess of $300,000 in each of those years and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year;

(7) Any trust, with total assets in excess of $5,000,000, not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, whose purchase is directed by a sophisticated person as described in § 230.506(b)(2)(ii);

(8) Any entity in which all of the equity owners are accredited investors;

(9) Any entity, of a type not listed in paragraph (a)(1), (2), (3), (7), or (8), not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, owning investments in excess of $5,000,000;

(10) Any natural person holding in good standing one or more professional certifications or designations or credentials from an accredited educational institution that the SEC has designated as qualifying an individual for accredited investor status. Under this category the SEC designated persons holding the following licenses: (i) Series 7; (ii) Series 82; and (iii) Series 65.

(11) Any natural person who is a “knowledgeable employee,” as defined in rule 3c–5(a)(4) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, of the issuer of the securities being offered or sold where the issuer would be an investment company, as defined in section 3 of such act, but for the exclusion provided by either section 3(c)(1) or section 3(c)(7) of such act;

(12) Any “family office,” as defined in rule 202(a)(11)(G)–1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940:

(i) With assets under management in excess of $5,000,000,

              (ii) That is not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, and

             (iii) Whose prospective investment is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such family office is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment; and

(13) Any “family client,” as defined in rule 202(a)(11)(G)–1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 , of a family office meeting the requirements in paragraph (a)(12) of this section and whose prospective investment in the issuer is directed by such family office pursuant to paragraph (a)(12)(iii).

 

* Disclaimer: The data presented in this article is based on the information available at the time of the publication. For updated data and specific questions, reach professional help.

The Origins of KoreConX Trust Charter

I often get asked a number of questions when we’re doing presentations about how we got everything started. And today, I think what I want to talk about is, which is really important to us is the origin of the KoreConX Trust Charter. And why did we create it in the first place? So when Jason Futko and I got the company started, we came from the public capital markets, and the things we saw, well, I’m not going to cover that here. But we thought that was only isolated to the publicly traded world, it wasn’t, it was also the private company world. And we found that that in the private company world, it, it was just even more just magnified times, not 10 Times as they say, it’s 100, 1000 times because there’s that many more privately held companies versus public. So you can imagine how fragmented it is. So when we saw the emergence of the online capital markets, for private companies, with the introduction of the Jobs Act, wow, what an opportunity, but at the same time, if the problem kept going, this thing would never grow. 

It will never grow. And it is growing. But the problems still haunt us the way we operate. And not seeing the way we as a company operate, but the way the industry and some participants have been operating for years. So when we set out to create KoreConX, and when we launched it, I mean, we’ve been doing this for over a decade planning and strategizing until we did launch the platform. But we wanted to make sure we get it in a different way. And that’s come with a price for us in many ways. Some people wouldn’t partner with us because there was no financial gain, for us to work with them. I know that sounds weird, but some people would not partner with us because well, if there’s, if you’re not financially motivated, then there’s no reason for us to be partners, which I thought was a bit odd. Because what we’re trying to do is bring a solution to the market. 

You keep your revenue, we keep our revenue, and everything moves forward. It’s a regulated space, we you know, this is, it’s the forefront of everything. So, you know, we sat down all of us, myself, Kiran Garimella, Jason, and coming up with a Charter when we first introduced it in 2016. Nobody was paying attention to it. And of course, now we’re so busy building and trying to figure things out that there was not enough time. But now, it has reemerged again. 

But our origins were right from the beginning. We wanted to make sure that people understood how we did business and what we were not ready to do. And these things have been there since the day we started. And it’s hard. It’s extremely hard. It’s hard, because it’s so easy to get caught in and saying yes, I’ll take it, you know, getting paid a little percentage from the credit card company getting paid from another service, just because you’re delivering it, you get paid, you make extra. And all of a sudden you’re part of that transaction where you shouldn’t be that transaction is regulated. And the only person there should be taking any fees related to that is the FINRA broker-dealer. 

In this in, in this instance. So we made that decision a long time ago. As I said, it has been hard. Even with our shareholders, it didn’t, my apologies become Gladiators are Gladiators, it didn’t go well with them. Because, hey, look at that it’s a $100 million deal. If you just got 1%. I know if you just got 1%. But even if you could take the 1%, which there is a way of doing it compliantly we did not want to be a FINRA broker-dealer. We did not want to become a broker-dealer. We couldn’t deliver what we’re doing. 

If we were a broker-dealer, we needed to create an infrastructure that everybody could work on. Everybody could, you know, transact on and work with each other without having to worry about over each other’s back. And it had to be in a way that it wouldn’t, we will never compete with them. We’re only here to support them and help them grow their business, which we’ve done with many broker-dealers. So this has been at the Kore, at the Kore of everything we’ve done, is making sure that this is the way we operate. And today, we’re re-launching the Charter of Trust. Again, we’re reemerging and why now? 

Well, 2023 was a very hectic year, we had to deal with the issues with FTX and Binance and I know that’s not related to us, but it really is why there are people there’s companies or security regulators and the entire all the activity they’re getting throughout the world and the exposure it’s putting what is the saying to people don’t Trust us because of the technology. It’s not we’re human beings as human beings, we’re flawed. We need to follow certain rules that are not perfect. I can tell you that right now. A lot of my staff partners, Gladiators will tell you I of course I make mistakes, but I’m not gonna give up and I’m gonna make it better.

I’m going to always try to make it better for them for everyone. There’s a way to do things the right way. So you never have to be compromised in any situation. So we’ve lived up to that. We’ve never, ever, unless we own the business, unless we own that business in particular, only then do we charge without revenue, and we keep it otherwise, that revenue does not belong to us, whether it’s credit card, bank, and escrow, again, that belongs to those third-party vendors, they’re investing heavily, just the same way we are on their infrastructure, the last thing they want is someone taking a piece of their piece of their business and boom, scooping it up. And that’s been going on for years. And that had to come to an end. And then of course, the bigger one, why Trust, because look at the data that you’re being provided to safeguard the word is safeguard companies. Intrapreneurs, listen carefully, you’re entrusting us with your most important information, which is your board, your shareholders or your company that you work so hard to get, the last thing you want is us going after them without you or your permission, or any in any way and sending them new offerings, you wouldn’t be happy with that? Well, guess what, and that’s exactly what happened in 2023. That was the last piece that this market needed. It didn’t break any securities law, they didn’t break any privacy law. They didn’t break any terms and conditions, law, or anything. This just broke the ultimate Trust in business, which is I trusted you as my partner as my vendor, as my vendor to house my information, my confidential data, and you use it for your own. And we have, we’ve been conflicted with this over and over and over again, to do the same. And we will not we never have and never will. 

Because that’s not who we are. And today, I’m excited. And I hope you read the Charter of Trust, all of us have signed it, all our senior-level people and our KoreTeam are dedicated to delivering just that, we will never be compromised by taking fees on any on the front end, the back end, we take our fees from our clients. And that’s it, we deliver the service. And that’s how we get paid. Number two, we do not sell anyone’s information. 

None of that information only belongs to you the company that you work hard to get those individuals into your company, and therefore it shouldn’t be going to anyone else. And I hope this proves a point. More importantly, for everyone else. And I know, we’re not the only ones. We’re not the only ones doing it. And I know the industry, all of us are changing and evolving. And I’m encouraging the entire industry to follow through. 

We welcome everybody to be part of this charter that we’ve created, sign on with us, and let’s show the industry that they can Trust all of us, all of us together working together, we will make this industry even stronger than it is today. Because we have look what we’ve done in a very short period of time. Our industry is only less than 10 years old, 10 years old, and only operational for the last six, seven years and look what we’ve accomplished so far. And we have so much great opportunity. It’s only uphill all the way through. It’s going to be bumpy. We’re going to be challenged. But the only way to make things even better is when we work together in order to make it happen.